Corporation to Develop Communities of Tampa, Inc.

The available records identify this entity, but do not yet include a plain-English role description.

1. Tue, Oct 13Upcoming1 item
   1. Application Number: RZ-PD 26-0673 Applicant: CORPORATION TO DEVELOP COMMUNITIES OF TAMPA INC. Location: SE Corner of E 23rd Ave & N 65th St. Folio Number: 42387.0000 & 42388.0000 Acreage: 1.71 acres, more or less Commissioner District: District 3 Comprehensive Plan: RES-12 Service Area: Urban Community Plan: East Lake-Orient Park Existing Zoning: RSC-9 Request: Rezone to PD RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Hearing Master: (Delete and Enter Text) Development Services: Approvable, Subject to Conditions Planning Commission: Consistent with PlanThe applicant for the zoning request.
2. Mon, Jul 201 item
   1. Zoning Hearing Master — AgendaApplicant for a rezoning request.
3. Mon, Jun 221 item
   1. Zoning Hearing Master — AgendaApplicant for RZ-PD 26-0673.2 reports
4. Fri, Nov 141 item
   1. V24-0015: Resolution to Vacate Portion of Right-of-WayPetitioner submitting the vacation request
5. Wed, Nov 121 item
   1. V24-0015 Public Hearing - Vacating Petition by Corporation to Develop Communities of Tampa, Inc. to vacate a portion of unimproved platted right-of-way in the plat of Oakland Hills in East Lake Orient Park. Adopt a Resolution vacating a portion of unimproved platted right-of-way in the plat of Oakland Hills, as recorded in Plat Book 24, Page 7, of the Public Records of Hillsborough County, Florida and described in the Resolution. The Petitioner, Corporation to Develop Communities of Tampa, Inc. (“CDC”), is the fee simple owner of the lands underlying the right-of-way and has submitted this request for maximum flexibility in site planning. CDC proposes to use State Housing Initiatives Partnership funds awarded to them by Hillsborough County for the development of 24 townhomes to be sold to income eligible first time homebuyers at or below 80% of area median income (as further explained in the background). Reviewing departments, agencies, and utility providers have raised no objections to this request. Estimated costs for required advertising per statute, recording fees, and processing are accounted for in the Petitioner’s application fee of $400.2 reports

POLISCOPE has no related bills or finance activity for this entity in the records it has processed. That is a gap in coverage, not a finding about the entity.