Jacksonville Baseball, LLC

The available records identify this entity, but do not yet include a plain-English role description.

1. Tue, Jun 231 item
   1. ORD Approp $703,183.22, Including (1) $519,414.54 from the Capital Proj - City Venues Surcharge - Baseball Park - Baseball Park - Bldg Systems - Other Construction Costs Acct, & (2) $183,768.68 from the Sports Complex CIP Fund, Including $168,239.93 from the Baseball Park - Baseball Park - Bldg Systems - Other Construction Costs Acct & $15,528.75 from the Baseball Park - Landscape & Turf - Other Construction Costs Acct, to the City Venues Capital Proj Fund - Baseball Grounds - MLB Requirements - Other Construction Costs Acct to Prov Funding for Certain Improvements to the Baseball Grounds of Jax; Amend the 26-30 5-Yr CIP Appvd by Ord 2025-505-E to Reflect This Approp of Funds; Waiving the Provisions of Sec 106.303 (Format & Determination of Amounts Appropriated), Subpt A (General Provisions), Pt 3 (Appropriations), Ch 106 (Budget & Accounting Code), Ord Code, to Allow Modification of the Approp of Funds Exhibit to Facilitate Compliance with the Requirements of the ADA; Auth the Mayor, or Her Desig, & Corp Sec to Execute a 2nd Amdt to Costs Disbursement Agrmt btwn the City & Jacksonville Baseball, LLC to Increase the Max Indebtedness Under the Cost Disbursement Agrmt by $703,183.22 for a New Total Max Indebtedness Not-To-Exceed $36,063,183.22; Prov for Oversight by the Dept of PW (Revised B.T. 26-082) (Dillard) (Req of Mayor) 5/26/26 CO Introduced: NCSPHS, R, F 6/1/26 NCSPHS Read 2nd & Rerefer 6/1/26 R Read 2nd & Rerefer 6/2/26 F Read 2nd & Rerefer 6/9/26 CO PH Read 2nd & Rerefer 6/15/26 NCSPHS Amend/Approve 6-1 (Gay) 6/15/26 R Amend/Approve 5-1 (Gay) 6/16/26 F Amend/Approve 4-3 (Howland, Diamond, Lahnen) 6/23/26 CO Amend/Approve 13-3 (Diamond, Freeman, Gay) Public Hearing Pursuant to Ch 166, F.S. & C.R. 3.601 - 6/9/26The entity entering into a cost disbursement agreement with the city.

POLISCOPE has no related bills, finance activity or mapped connections for this entity in the records it has processed. That is a gap in coverage, not a finding about the entity.