Kamala Harris

Very liberal academic scores suggest a preference for public provision of essential services. · 100% of readings agreed

• Academic score: DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117, Score -0.709 on a -1 to 1 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 1% of U.S. Senate · 117th Congress (n=102) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117
• Academic score: DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022, Jan 1, 2022, Score -1.029 on a -2.5 to 2.5 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 35% of 2022 presidential candidates (n=26) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022Jan 1, 2022

Very liberal academic scores suggest a preference for tax policies that narrow income differences. · 100% of readings agreed

• Academic score: DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117, Score -0.709 on a -1 to 1 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 1% of U.S. Senate · 117th Congress (n=102) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117
• Academic score: DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022, Jan 1, 2022, Score -1.029 on a -2.5 to 2.5 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 35% of 2022 presidential candidates (n=26) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022Jan 1, 2022

Very liberal academic scores suggest a preference for more community say over essential local assets. · 100% of readings agreed

• Academic score: DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117, Score -0.709 on a -1 to 1 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 1% of U.S. Senate · 117th Congress (n=102) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117
• Academic score: DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022, Jan 1, 2022, Score -1.029 on a -2.5 to 2.5 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 35% of 2022 presidential candidates (n=26) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022Jan 1, 2022

Very liberal academic scores suggest a preference for collective bargaining and agreements. · 100% of readings agreed

• Academic score: DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117, Score -0.709 on a -1 to 1 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 1% of U.S. Senate · 117th Congress (n=102) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117
• Academic score: DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022, Jan 1, 2022, Score -1.029 on a -2.5 to 2.5 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 35% of 2022 presidential candidates (n=26) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022Jan 1, 2022

Very liberal academic scores suggest a preference for common predictability rules over individual negotiation. · 100% of readings agreed

• Academic score: DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117, Score -0.709 on a -1 to 1 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 1% of U.S. Senate · 117th Congress (n=102) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117
• Academic score: DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022, Jan 1, 2022, Score -1.029 on a -2.5 to 2.5 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 35% of 2022 presidential candidates (n=26) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022Jan 1, 2022

Very liberal academic scores suggest supporting formal collective representation for employees. · 100% of readings agreed

• Academic score: DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117, Score -0.709 on a -1 to 1 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 1% of U.S. Senate · 117th Congress (n=102) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117
• Academic score: DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022, Jan 1, 2022, Score -1.029 on a -2.5 to 2.5 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 35% of 2022 presidential candidates (n=26) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022Jan 1, 2022

Very liberal academic scores suggest a preference for more automatic income support during periods without work. · 100% of readings agreed

• Academic score: DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117, Score -0.709 on a -1 to 1 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 1% of U.S. Senate · 117th Congress (n=102) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117
• Academic score: DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022, Jan 1, 2022, Score -1.029 on a -2.5 to 2.5 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 35% of 2022 presidential candidates (n=26) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022Jan 1, 2022

Very liberal academic scores suggest a preference for broad eligibility for public benefits. · 100% of readings agreed

• Academic score: DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117, Score -0.709 on a -1 to 1 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 1% of U.S. Senate · 117th Congress (n=102) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117
• Academic score: DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022, Jan 1, 2022, Score -1.029 on a -2.5 to 2.5 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 35% of 2022 presidential candidates (n=26) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022Jan 1, 2022

Very liberal academic scores suggest a preference for broad public guarantees for healthcare costs. · 100% of readings agreed

• Academic score: DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117, Score -0.709 on a -1 to 1 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 1% of U.S. Senate · 117th Congress (n=102) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117
• Academic score: DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022, Jan 1, 2022, Score -1.029 on a -2.5 to 2.5 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 35% of 2022 presidential candidates (n=26) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022Jan 1, 2022

Very liberal academic scores suggest supporting a broad public income floor for retirement. · 100% of readings agreed

• Academic score: DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117, Score -0.709 on a -1 to 1 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 1% of U.S. Senate · 117th Congress (n=102) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DW-NOMINATE score from roll-call votes covering 115–117
• Academic score: DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022, Jan 1, 2022, Score -1.029 on a -2.5 to 2.5 scale (negative = left, positive = right); label "Very Liberal". Peer comparison: 35% of 2022 presidential candidates (n=26) have a lower (more left) score. A one-dimensional left–right summary; it does not measure any specific policy tradeoff.DIME CFscore score from campaign donors covering 2002–2022Jan 1, 2022

• Executive action: Created the Privacy Enforcement and Protection Unit, Jul 19, 2012, Official action reported by insideprivacy.comCreated the Privacy Enforcement and Protection UnitJul 19, 2012