POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Alabama HB 437 revises parole board revocation rules, establishes hearing officers, and sets confinement penalties

Original title: Board of Pardons and Paroles; discretion whether to grant or deny parole, further provided; review of parole violations, procedure further provided to require consideration of totality of circumstances; penalties for certain parole-violations, increased

Last action · March 5, 2026: Read for the Second Time and placed on the CalendarSponsor: Hall (L)

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill establishes mandatory parole revocation for specified violent or serious offenses, creates the position of Parole Revocation Hearing Officer, and sets administrative sanction limits for technical violations starting October 1, 2026. The legislation details when parolees must serve their original sentences in state prison versus short-term confinement in s or county jails.

Why it matters

Changes incarceration and supervision requirements for parolees across Alabama, affecting county jail capacities, state prison populations, and sheriff liability protections during parole violation proceedings.

Background
  • The Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles is responsible for administering parole supervision and revocation proceedings across the state. context
  • This legislation builds upon prior statutory frameworks established in Section 15-22-32 of the Code of Alabama 1975 and amended by Act 2025-273. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

parolees

Subject to mandatory state prison revocation for specific offenses, capped short-term confinement periods, administrative sanctions, and specific hearing timelines.

Directly affected

county sheriffs

Granted discretion to refuse or release parolees under capacity, health, or security constraints, along with liability immunity and state mileage reimbursement provisions.

Directly affected

Department of Corrections

Responsible for notifying the board upon parolee returns, reimbursing county mileage rates, and managing state prison facility commitments.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a parolee is arrested for a new offense but later found not guilty?
The board may place the parolee on the next practicable parole hearing docket if found not guilty, or if the offense was dismissed or with prejudice and without conditions, unless the record independently establishes conduct constituting a parole violation.
When can a county sheriff refuse to admit a parolee referred for confinement?
A sheriff may refuse admittance or release a parolee if the individual has a serious health condition, creates a security risk to the county jail, or if the jail is near, at, or over capacity.
What is the maximum duration of confinement a parole officer can impose as an administrative sanction?
A parole officer may impose short confinement periods not to exceed six days per month during any three separate months, totaling no more than nine days, served in two-day or three-day consecutive periods.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently on floor. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Passed.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Mar 5, 2026House
    Read for the Second Time and placed on the Calendar
  2. Mar 4, 2026HouseCommittee
    Reported Out of Committee House of Origin
  3. Feb 12, 2026HouseCommittee
    Pending Committee Action in House of Origin
  4. Feb 12, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read for the first time and referred to the House Committee on Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Hall (L)HousePrimary sponsorNo profile match

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Codification of Mandatory Revocation Triggers

The bill shifts from broad board discretion to mandatory state prison revocation for enumerated violent and firearm-related offenses.

Connected Entities

Alabama Comptroller's Office, Hall, Board of Pardons and Paroles and 1 more
OrganizationAlabama Comptroller's Office“State office determining the state mileage rate for inmate transport”Map →
PersonHall“Legislative sponsor of HB 437”Map →
OrganizationBoard of Pardons and Paroles“Alabama state board responsible for granting, denying, and revoking parole”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Corrections“State agency managing prison facilities and inmate transfers”Map →

Sources

Open source document

alison.legislature.state.al.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz35
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record