POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofLabor →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
High Impact

Michigan Bill Requires Workplace Heat Standards and Retaliation Protections

Original title: Labor: health and safety; occupational health standards related to exposure to work in hot environments; require director to promulgate.

Last action · November 5, 2026: bill electronically reproduced 10/28/2026Sponsor: Carrie Rheingans

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

The bill requires the director of the Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity to occupational health standards for employees exposed to hot indoor or outdoor environments. The rules would mandate heat prevention plans, temperature monitoring, mandatory water and rest breaks, employee observation, incident reporting, training, and anti-retaliation protections.

Why it matters

Employers across Michigan would be required to implement formal heat safety plans, monitor workplace temperatures, and provide scheduled water and rest breaks when temperatures cross specific thresholds determined by the .

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

employees who are exposed to heat or work in hot environments

Workers receive mandatory water and rest breaks, safety observation, training, and anti-retaliation protections when exposed to hot indoor or outdoor environments.

Directly affected

employers

Employers must create prevention plans, conduct heat monitoring, provide rest breaks, track and report heat-related incidents, and ensure employee training.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggers mandatory water and rest breaks under the bill?
Water and rest breaks are triggered when workplace temperatures reach initial and higher levels determined by the .
Does the bill protect workers who report heat hazards?
Yes, the bill explicitly prohibits employer retaliation against any employee who reports workplace heat hazards to the department of labor and economic opportunity.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Nov 5, 2026House
    bill electronically reproduced 10/28/2026
  2. Oct 28, 2026HouseCommittee
    referred to Committee on Government Operations
  3. Oct 28, 2026HouseIntroduced
    read a first time
  4. Oct 28, 2026HouseIntroduced
    introduced by Representative Rep. Carrie Rheingans

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity, Michigan, Carrie Rheingans and 1 more
OrganizationDepartment of Labor and Economic Opportunity“State department receiving employee heat hazard reports”Map →
locationMichigan“State jurisdiction for the proposed occupational health standards”Map →
PersonCarrie Rheingans“Bill sponsor in the Michigan House of Representatives”Map →
OrganizationUnited States Department of Labor“Federal department referenced regarding potential federal occupational safety st”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record