POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut establishes mandatory risk-limiting post-election audits and ballot manifests starting in 2027

Original title: AN ACT IMPLEMENTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE RISK-LIMITING AUDITS WORKING GROUP.

Last action · April 20, 2026: Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, SenateSponsor: Rob Sampson

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Starting January 1, 2027, registrars of voters in Connecticut must conduct public s of state elections following procedures set by the Secretary of the State. The legislation also requires polling places and central counting locations to create s within 72 hours after polls close and establishes a three-municipality pilot program for risk-limiting audits in 2026.

Why it matters

Changes post-election review procedures across every municipality by requiring manual checks of statistical paper ballot samples, establishing new deadlines for election return filings, and altering timelines for candidates filing court challenges or requests.

Background
  • Connecticut conducts regular state elections and municipal elections governed by Title 9 of the general statutes. context
  • The Government Administration and Elections Committee handles legislative proposals concerning election laws, voting procedures, and campaign finance in the Connecticut General Assembly. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

registrars of voters

Registrars of voters must conduct mandatory risk-limiting audits, submit ballot manifests, and comply with Secretary of the State procedures.

Directly affected

election officials

Election officials who participate in audit administration are compensated by municipalities at standard rates of pay and must create ballot manifests.

Directly affected

The University of Connecticut

The university is required to analyze audit results forwarded by the Secretary of the State and submit a written report identifying any concerns or discrepancies.

Directly affected

candidates and electors

Candidates and electors gain specific timelines to file legal complaints and challenges following audit outcomes.

Key Facts

  • Beginning January 1, 2027, registrars of voters must conduct a risk-limiting audit of state elections between the 15th day after an election and two business days before the canvass of votes.
  • Offices subject to risk-limiting audits include presidential electors, state offices, randomly selected congressional representatives, and at least five percent of state senator and representative offices.
  • The risk limit for each audit shall be set at not more than five percent.
  • Audit results must be reported to the Secretary of the State and immediately forwarded to The University of Connecticut for analysis and reporting to the State Elections Enforcement Commission.
Show all 9 facts
  • If a risk-limiting audit produces an outcome of 'INCONCLUSIVE', the Secretary of the State must order a manual recount of all ballots cast for that office.
  • Election officials in each polling place and absentee ballot counter in central locations must create a ballot manifest within 72 hours after the close of polls at each state election.
  • Complaints regarding election rulings or vote counts filed in response to an audit must be brought to court within seven days after the close of the audit.
  • The Secretary of the State shall establish a pilot program for conducting risk-limiting audits at state elections in 2026 across three randomly selected municipalities of varying population sizes.
  • Municipal clerks must return statements of elected municipal officials to the Secretary of the State not later than the last day of the month in which the municipal election was held.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a risk-limiting audit?
A is a publicly verifiable auditing procedure that manually examines a statistical sample of paper ballots, produces an outcome of 'ACCEPTABLE' or 'INCONCLUSIVE', and guarantees a specified risk limit.
Who analyzes the results of the post-election audits?
The Secretary of the State forwards reported audit results to The University of Connecticut for analysis, which then submits a written report to the Secretary and the State Elections Enforcement Commission.
When must ballot manifests be created after an election?
s must be created not later than seventy-two hours after the close of the polls at each state election for polling places and central counting locations, or within twenty-four hours after completing a .
What happens if a risk-limiting audit is inconclusive?
If an audit for a particular office produces an outcome of 'INCONCLUSIVE', the Secretary of the State must order a manual recount of all ballots cast for that office.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Tabled in the Senate.

Procedural history

16 actions
  1. Apr 20, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  2. Apr 20, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    No New File by Committee on Appropriations
  3. Apr 20, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  4. Apr 20, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  5. Apr 17, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable
  6. Apr 15, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Immediate Transmittal
Show 10 earlier actions
  1. Apr 15, 2026Senate
    Referred by Senate to Committee on Appropriations
  2. Apr 9, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 564
  3. Apr 9, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 330
  4. Apr 9, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  5. Apr 9, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
  6. Apr 2, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/08/26 5:00 PM
  7. Mar 23, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  8. Mar 23, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable Substitute
  9. Mar 9, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/13
  10. Mar 2, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Government Administration and Elections

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Transition to Risk-Limiting Audits

The state is shifting its post-election verification framework from standard percentage sample audits to formal risk-limiting audits with mandatory University of Connecticut analysis starting in 2027.

Connected Entities

The University of Connecticut, Comptroller, Treasurer and 4 more
OrganizationThe University of Connecticut“Entity designated to analyze audit results and submit written reports”Map →
PersonComptroller“State official participating in the canvass of votes”Map →
PersonTreasurer“State official participating in the canvass of votes”Map →
PersonSen. Rob Sampson“Co-sponsor representing the 16th District”Map →
OrganizationGovernment Administration and Elections Committee“Committee that sponsored Senate Bill No. 394”Map →
OrganizationSecretary of the State“State official responsible for prescribing audit instructions, regulations, and ”Map →
OrganizationState Elections Enforcement Commission“Commission receiving audit analysis reports and investigative findings”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 80)
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record