POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Idaho Senate Bill 1289 Places Citizenship Limits on Athletic Scholarships at Public Colleges

Original title: EDUCATION – Adds to existing law to establish provisions regarding scholarship limitations for certain student athletes at public institutions of higher education.

Last action · February 16, 2026: Reported Printed; referred to Education

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 1289 restricts non-U.S. citizens to receiving no more than ten percent of athletic scholarships across all sports rosters excluding football, and five percent for football rosters, at Idaho public colleges and universities starting July 1, 2026. The legislation also caps any single men's or women's athletic team at fifty percent non-U.S. citizen scholarship recipients while requiring public institutions to give overall scholarship preference to Idaho residents.

Why it matters

The measure directly alters how public universities distribute financial aid and athletic roster funding, establishing strict citizenship quotas for student-athlete aid while protecting existing scholarship recipients enrolled before the effective date for up to four consecutive academic years.

Background
  • State legislatures frequently introduce legislation regulating university admissions, financial aid distribution, and residency requirements for public institutions. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Idaho public institutions of higher education

Colleges and universities must alter athletic scholarship allocation policies to comply with residency preferences and citizenship percentage caps.

Directly affected

Student athletes

Athletes face new citizenship limits and quotas governing eligibility for financial assistance, tuition waivers, and grants.

Directly affected

Idaho residents

In-state residents receive mandatory preference in scholarship awards granted by public higher education institutions.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who does Senate Bill 1289 apply to?
It applies to all Idaho public institutions of higher education and student athletes seeking or receiving athletic scholarships.
Are football rosters subject to the same percentage cap as other sports?
No. General sports rosters are capped at 10 percent for non-U.S. citizens, while football rosters are capped at 5 percent.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 16, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed; referred to Education
  2. Feb 13, 2026Introduced
    Introduced; read first time; referred to JR for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Connected Entities

EDUCATION COMMITTEE, Idaho State Board of Education
OrganizationEDUCATION COMMITTEE“Senate committee that introduced Senate Bill 1289”Map →
OrganizationIdaho State Board of Education“Required to promulgate rules to implement the section subject to legislative app”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy75
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record