POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Arizona proposes referral on English language education requirements and structured immersion models in public schools

Original title: schools; English language learners; requirements

Last action · January 26, 2026: House Second ReadingSponsors: Mariana Sandoval and 15 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

This concurrent resolution refers a measure to Arizona voters at the next general election that establishes new education requirements and standards for English language learners in public schools, including mandated instructional time and parental legal standing. The measure directs public schools to ensure English language learners master English and provides frameworks for structured immersion and dual-language immersion programs.

Why it matters

If approved by voters, parents gain the explicit right to sue public schools for enforcement of English language learner program standards and recover actual damages and attorney fees, while school districts face updated guidelines for and dual-language programs.

Background
  • Arizona public schools operate under specific structured English immersion requirements governed by state statutes and the State Board of Education. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

English language learners

Pupils identified as non-English proficient must be enrolled in structured or alternative English instruction programs and are provided mandated instructional time.

Directly affected

Parents and legal guardians

Parents gain legal standing to sue for enforcement of educational standards for English language learners and may recover attorney fees and compensatory damages.

Directly affected

School districts and charter schools

Schools must identify home languages, administer proficiency assessments, and implement approved structured English immersion or dual-language programs.

Key Facts

  • Repeals sections 15-752, 15-753, 15-754, and 15-755 of the Arizona Revised Statutes.
  • Requires school districts and charter schools to identify the primary or home language of all new pupils.
  • Mandates that public schools ensure English language learners receive quality education, master English, and access research-based language programs.
  • Grants parents or legal guardians legal standing to sue for enforcement of English language learner program standards, including recovery of actual and compensatory damages and attorney fees.
Show all 8 facts
  • Requires the State Board of Education to adopt research-based and evidence-based structured English immersion models with minimum daily durations of 120 minutes for kindergarten through grade five, and 100 minutes for grades six through twelve.
  • Permits school districts and charter schools to establish dual-language immersion programs for both native and nonnative English speakers.
  • Requires the measure to be submitted to voters at the next general election for approval.
  • Directs the Department of Education to annually request an appropriation to cover the purchase of language proficiency assessments and scoring materials.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a student is determined not to be English language proficient?
The pupil is classified as an English language learner and enrolled in an English language education program.
Can parents take legal action if schools fail to meet English language learner standards?
Yes, parents or legal guardians are granted legal standing to sue for enforcement and can be awarded normal attorney fees and actual and compensatory damages if successful.
What are the minimum daily instructional time requirements for structured English immersion?
The minimum requirement is 120 minutes per day for kindergarten through grade five, and 100 minutes per day for grades six through twelve.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the House floor.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 26, 2026HouseFloor
    House Second Reading
  2. Jan 22, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House First Reading

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of Parent Enforcement Rights

The measure introduces a provision granting parents legal standing to sue for enforcement of English language learner educational standards with potential recovery of actual damages and attorney fees.

Connected Entities

Janeen Connolly, State Board of Education, Brian Garcia and 11 more
PersonJaneen Connolly“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
OrganizationState Board of Education“Adopt and approve research-based models of structured English immersion”Map →
PersonBrian Garcia“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonLupe Contreras“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Education“Annually request appropriations and provide staff support”Map →
PersonAnna Abeytia“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonCesar Aguilar“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonSarah Liguori“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonPatty Contreras“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
locationArizona“State where the legislation is enacted”Map →
PersonMariana Sandoval“Representative introducing the bill”Map →
PersonElda Luna-Nájera“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonAaron Márquez“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonLorena Austin“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.azleg.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record