POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

House Bill 749 extends deadlines for renewable energy partial tax exemptions and fee-in-lieu agreements

Original title: Ad valorem tax; extend time for partial exemption and fee-in-lieu of ad valorem tax agreement for certain renewable energy projects.

Last action · February 12, 2026: 02/12 (H) Died On CalendarSponsor: Fred Shanks

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

House Bill 749 extends the construction start deadline to December 31, 2030, for renewable energy projects to qualify for partial exemptions and shifts the authorization deadline for county boards and municipalities to July 1, 2029. It similarly extends deadlines for of tax agreements for certain renewable energy projects.

Why it matters

Renewable energy developers and local taxing authorities gain additional years to negotiate tax exemptions and agreements, directly altering long-term property tax revenues for county governments and school districts.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

County boards of supervisors and municipal authorities

They receive extended time periods to authorize partial ad valorem tax exemptions and negotiate fee-in-lieu agreements with renewable energy enterprises.

Directly affected

Renewable energy project developers

They receive an extended construction window through December 31, 2030, to qualify for partial ad valorem tax exemptions.

Directly affected

School districts

Their apportionment of tax revenues and fee-in-lieu payments is governed by statutory calculations and negotiated agreements between local authorities and enterprises.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are medical cannabis establishments eligible for fee-in-lieu of ad valorem tax agreements?
No, county boards of supervisors and municipal authorities are explicitly prohibited from entering into agreements with medical cannabis establishments.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Feb 12, 2026House
    02/12 (H) Died On Calendar
  2. Feb 3, 2026HouseCommittee
    02/03 (H) Title Suff Do Pass
  3. Jan 16, 2026HouseCommittee
    01/16 (H) Referred To Ways and Means

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Extension of Renewable Energy Tax Incentives

The bill pushes out sunset dates for renewable energy ad valorem exemptions and fee-in-lieu agreements by three years, from 2026/2027 to 2029/2030.

Connected Entities

Mississippi Development Authority, Mississippi Major Economic Impact Authority
OrganizationMississippi Development Authority“Approves fee-in-lieu agreements and establishes minimum criteria for qualified b”Map →
OrganizationMississippi Major Economic Impact Authority“May receive allocated portions of fee-in-lieu payments to repay advanced funds.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

billstatus.ls.state.ms.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record