The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Texas House Resolution 148 expresses support for a federally owned transcontinental pipeline system
Last action · September 2, 2025: FiledSponsor: Mark Dorazio
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
The Texas House of Representatives adopted H.R. 148 to officially express support for a federally owned running from the western coast of the Mexico-United States border to refineries along the Gulf Coast of Texas and Louisiana.
The measure establishes an official state legislative stance on federal infrastructure planning, without allocating state funds or creating binding regulatory mandates for residents.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Gulf Coast refineries in Texas and Louisiana
Refineries in the region are designated as the endpoint for the proposed transcontinental pipeline system transporting petroleum products.
Key Facts
- The resolution expresses support for a federally owned transcontinental pipeline system stretching from the western coast of the Mexico-United States border to Gulf Coast refineries in Texas and Louisiana.
- The proposed pipeline is intended to facilitate the transport of crude oil and liquefied petroleum gas extracted from the South China Sea.
- The measure suggests that federal ownership would allow the United States to utilize border geography without state interference and regulations.
- The resolution proposes attaching a transport surcharge to all products moved via the pipeline to help pay down the national debt and negotiate border security enforcement with Mexico.
Show all 5 facts
- The text states the project would supply refined products such as gasoline, jet fuel, diesel, fuel oil, and liquefied petroleum gas to European markets.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does House Resolution 148 do?
Does this resolution create any new laws or fund construction?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This resolution did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.
Procedural history
1 action- Sep 2, 2025HouseIntroducedFiled
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
capitol.texas.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance15Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 15)
- Controversy25Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz10Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
