POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Utah prohibits private probation providers from offering dual compensated services and requires monthly sheriff reports

Original title: Private Probation and Court Ordered Services Amendments

Last action · March 17, 2026: Governor SignedSponsors: Jen Plumb and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Utah law now bars s from simultaneously offering probation supervision and other compensated human services to the same defendant, with exceptions for remote areas. Effective May 6, 2026, providers must also submit monthly supervision reports to county sheriffs, disclose conflicts of interest, and allow defendants to choose their own treatment providers.

Why it matters

Defendants under private probation can no longer be required to receive paid treatment or educational services directly from their supervising probation provider unless no other licensed provider is within 50 miles and the defendant gives written informed consent.

Background
  • Private probation providers in Utah operate under state licensing standards to supervise court-ordered defendants as alternatives to municipal or county probation services. context
  • The Private Probation Provider Licensing Act governs the conduct, reporting obligations, and operational boundaries of private entities handling court-ordered supervision. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

private probation providers

Providers face restrictions on offering simultaneous compensated services to probationers, must report monthly to county sheriffs, and face license revocation for non-compliance.

Directly affected

defendants on probation

Defendants gain the right to select independent treatment providers from a list and must give informed consent if receiving dual services from a probation provider in remote areas.

Directly affected

county sheriffs

County sheriffs receive mandatory monthly supervision reports from private probation providers operating within their county.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can my private probation officer also provide my court-ordered mental health therapy?
Generally no. s are prohibited from simultaneously offering probation supervision and other compensated services like mental health therapy, education, or rehabilitation to the same defendant.
Are there any exceptions where a probation provider can also offer treatment services?
Yes. Dual services are permitted only if no other licensed provider offering those services is located within 50 miles of your residence and you provide written informed consent.
What information must a private probation provider report to county sheriffs?
Providers must submit a monthly report to the county sheriff identifying each supervised individual, the crimes they committed, their supervision level, and other relevant HIPAA-compliant information determined by the sheriff.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

46 actions
  1. Mar 17, 2026Lieutenant Governor's office for filingEnrolled
    Governor Signed
  2. Mar 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to Governor
  3. Mar 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
  4. Mar 11, 2026Senate
    Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
  5. Mar 11, 2026Senate Secretary
    Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
  6. Mar 10, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
Show 40 earlier actions
  1. Mar 10, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel / Enrolling
    Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling
  2. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
  3. Mar 10, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received from House
  4. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ to Senate
  5. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
  6. Mar 6, 2026HouseFloor
    House/ passed 3rd reading
  7. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ uncircled
  8. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ circled
  9. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ 3rd reading
  10. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar
  11. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ 3rd Reading Calendar to Rules
  12. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ 2nd reading
  13. Mar 3, 2026House
    House/ committee report favorable
  14. Mar 3, 2026House
    House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  15. Mar 2, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  16. Feb 24, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  17. Feb 24, 2026House
    House/ received from Senate
  18. Feb 24, 2026Senate
    Senate/ to House
  19. Feb 24, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 3rd reading
  20. Feb 24, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 3rd reading
  21. Feb 23, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate/ passed 2nd reading
  22. Feb 23, 2026Senate
    Senate/ uncircled
  23. Feb 11, 2026Senate
    Senate/ circled
  24. Feb 11, 2026Senate
    Senate/ uncircled
  25. Feb 9, 2026Senate
    Senate/ circled
  26. Feb 9, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  27. Jan 27, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
  28. Jan 27, 2026Senate
    Senate/ comm rpt/ amended
  29. Jan 26, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  30. Jan 26, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Amendment Recommendation
  31. Jan 26, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  32. Jan 20, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  33. Jan 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  34. Jan 17, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0142
  35. Jan 17, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0142
  36. Jan 16, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  37. Jan 15, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0142
  38. Jan 15, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0142
  39. Jan 15, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  40. Jan 15, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Stricter Conflict-of-Interest Controls for Probation

The legislation closes a regulatory gap by explicitly forbidding private probation providers from monetizing required treatment services for individuals under their supervision, barring narrow geographic exceptions.

Connected Entities

Utah
locationUtah“state where the legislation applies”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance55
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz10
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record