POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCrime →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Delaware allows separate thefts in a course of conduct to be grouped into a single prosecution

Original title: AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THEFT.

Last action · September 14, 2026: Signed by GovernorSponsors: Frank Cooke and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

Delaware permits the values of items stolen at separate times to be combined into a single theft charge when committed as part of a . The prosecution must prove this course of conduct beyond a reasonable doubt to elevate the penalty for higher dollar value thefts.

Why it matters

Prosecutors can aggregate separate low-level thefts into a single higher-value charge, potentially increasing the applicable criminal penalties for repeat offenders.

Background
  • Title 11 of the Delaware Code contains the state's criminal laws, including definitions and penalties for offenses such as theft. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Prosecutors

Prosecutors are permitted to group the values of items stolen at separate times into a single theft charge.

Directly affected

Defendants in theft cases

Defendants face the possibility of having separate thefts combined into a single charge with potentially elevated penalties if a course of conduct is proven.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can multiple thefts committed at different times be combined into one charge?
Yes, if the thefts are part of a , their values can be grouped and prosecuted as a single charge.
What must the prosecution prove regarding the course of conduct?
The must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in order to elevate the penalty for higher dollar value thefts.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

6 actions
  1. Sep 14, 2026Office of the GovernorEnrolled
    Signed by Governor
  2. Jun 30, 2026SenateFloor
    Passed By Senate. Votes: 21 YES
  3. Jun 24, 2026SenateCommittee
    Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 4 On Its Merits
  4. Jun 11, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate
  5. Jun 11, 2026HouseFloor
    Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 ABSENT
  6. Jun 10, 2026HouseIntroduced
    was introduced and adopted in lieu of HB 276

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Show 1 earlier roll call
Motion succeededHouse6/11/2026Open StatesOfficial roll call ↗

SM

Total

40

Yes
40
No
0
Present
0
Not voting
0
Abstain
0

How they voted (40)

16 more members

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Aggregation of Separate Theft Offenses

The legislation modifies prosecution practices by formally permitting the aggregation of disparate theft incidents under a defined course of conduct standard.

Connected Entities

Delaware
locationDelaware“Jurisdiction enacting the legislation”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legis.delaware.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record