POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah HB 477 Revises Municipal Incorporation, Planning Commissions, and Land Use Regulations

Original title: Land Use Regulation Revisions

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsors: Jill Koford and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

This bill modifies land use regulations across Utah by requiring certain municipalities to allow s on lots of 10,000 square feet or larger, updating planning commission training mandates, and revising rules for feasibility requests, business use classifications, and infrastructure completion assurances.

Why it matters

Property owners on lots 10,000 square feet or larger in specified municipalities gain the right to build s, while developers and local governments face updated financial assurance and planning commission compliance standards.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Property owners

Property owners on lots of 10,000 square feet or larger gain the right to build detached accessory dwelling units under new municipal regulations.

Directly affected

Municipalities and counties

Local governments must update land use ordinances, planning commission removal and training rules, and infrastructure completion assurance accounts.

Directly affected

Planning commission members

Planning commission members must complete four hours of annual land use and ethics training and adhere to new removal and recusal standards.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What properties are required to allow detached accessory dwelling units under HB 477?
Specified municipalities must permit a on any lot or parcel that is 10,000 square feet or larger and contains a permitted single-family dwelling.
Are planning commission members required to complete training?
Yes, members of planning commissions in specified cities and counties must complete four hours of annual land use training, covering general powers and duties, land use, and ethics.
Can municipalities require cash deposit completion assurances to be placed in interest-bearing accounts?
Yes, beginning May 7, 2025, if a municipality or county accepts cash deposits as a form of and the applicant posts a new cash deposit, the municipality or county must place it in an interest-bearing account and return earned interest to the applicant.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

18 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ sent to Rules
  4. Mar 2, 2026House
    House Comm - Recommends Returned to Rules
  5. Feb 24, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0477S01
  6. Feb 24, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0477S01
Show 12 earlier actions
  1. Feb 23, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0477S01
  2. Feb 23, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0477S01
  3. Feb 11, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
  4. Feb 9, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  5. Feb 7, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0477
  6. Feb 7, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0477
  7. Feb 4, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  8. Feb 4, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  9. Feb 4, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0477
  10. Feb 4, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0477
  11. Feb 4, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  12. Feb 4, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

2 patterns noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Mandatory ADU Allowance by Lot Size

The bill shifts local zoning authority by requiring specified municipalities to permit detached accessory dwelling units on parcels of 10,000 square feet or larger.

financial connection95% confidence

Interest on Completion Assurances

Requires local governments to place developer cash completion assurance deposits into interest-bearing accounts and return earned interest upon completion.

Connected Entities

State Tax Commission, Kirk A. Cullimore, Department of Workforce Services and 3 more
OrganizationState Tax Commission“Tax commission created in Section 59-1-201”Map →
PersonKirk A. Cullimore“Senate Sponsor of HB 477”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Workforce Services“Department housing the Housing and Community Development Division”Map →
OrganizationHousing and Community Development Division“Division within the Department of Workforce Services”Map →
OrganizationMunicipal Incorporation Expendable Special Revenue Fund“Expendable special revenue fund receiving legislative appropriations and fees”Map →
PersonJill Koford“Chief Sponsor of HB 477”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record