New Restrictions on PFAS-Based Firefighting Foam and Wastewater Testing
June 17, 2026
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
Where This Stands
Currently passed_both. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Signed.
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →The Frame
The bill directly impacts fire departments, industrial facilities, and public wastewater utilities by requiring them to phase out specific firefighting foams and implement new, recurring water quality sampling protocols to monitor for chemical contaminants.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Fire departments
Must cease the use and purchase of AFFF and submit inventory and disposal plans to the DEP.
Public wastewater utilities
Required to perform quarterly sampling of biosolids and treated effluent and report data to the DEP.
Department of Environmental Protection
Tasked with receiving reports, managing grant programs, and adopting EPA standards for water sampling.
Current stage: passed_both.
Signed.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF)?
What do wastewater treatment facilities need to do?
Are there financial resources available to help with these changes?
Why It Matters
The bill directly impacts fire departments, industrial facilities, and public wastewater utilities by requiring them to phase out specific firefighting foams and implement new, recurring water quality sampling protocols to monitor for chemical contaminants.
News Coverage
140 new Florida laws go into effect on July 1. Here are some you'll want to know
A total of 140 new state laws and the 2026-27 Florida budget take effect on July 1. These changes impact various sectors including public safety, environmental policy, healthcare, and education.
Lobbyists work for and against Florida governments dealing with PFAS pollution
Bias ratings based on AllSides / Media Bias/Fact Check
Voting Record
Passage
Total
117
Yes
107
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
10
Abstain
0
How they voted (117)
Rita Harris
Democratic · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Kaylee Tuck
Republican · yes
RaShon Young
Democratic · yes
Nathan Boyles
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
Jenna Persons-Mulicka
Republican · yes
Rachel Plakon
Republican · yes
Lauren Melo
Republican · yes
Alex Rizo
Republican · yes
Erika Booth
Republican · yes
Alex Andrade
Republican · yes
Lawrence McClure
Republican · yes
Linda Chaney
Republican · yes
Sam Garrison
Republican · yes
Yvonne Hinson
Democratic · not voting
Hillary Cassel
Republican · yes
Jessica Baker
Republican · yes
Fentrice Driskell
Democratic · yes
Ashley Gantt
Democratic · yes
Paula Stark
Republican · yes
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · yes
Michele Rayner
Democratic · yes
+ 93 more
Third Reading
Total
39
Yes
37
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (39)
Jason Pizzo
Independent · yes
Tina Polsky
Democratic · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
LaVon Bracy Davis
Democratic · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Alexis Calatayud
Republican · yes
Bryan Ávila
Republican · excused
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Tom Leek
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
Ben Albritton
Republican · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Kristen Arrington
Democratic · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · yes
Ralph Massullo
Republican · yes
Stan McClain
Republican · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Clay Yarborough
Republican · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Debbie Mayfield
Republican · yes
+ 15 more
Cosponsorship, Third Reading
Total
117
Yes
114
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
3
Abstain
0
How they voted (117)
Kevin Steele
Republican · yes
Anna Eskamani
Democratic · yes
Jenna Persons-Mulicka
Republican · not voting
Jennifer Canady
Republican · yes
Fiona McFarland
Republican · yes
Shane Abbott
Republican · yes
Daryl Campbell
Democratic · yes
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
Tyler Sirois
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
Leonard Spencer
Democratic · yes
Randy Maggard
Republican · yes
J.J. Grow
Republican · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · yes
Dave Smith
Republican · yes
Juan Porras
Republican · yes
Jose Alvarez
Democratic · yes
Danny Nix
Republican · yes
Robin Bartleman
Democratic · yes
Debra Tendrich
Democratic · yes
Mike Giallombardo
Republican · yes
Marie Woodson
Democratic · yes
Chase Tramont
Republican · yes
John Snyder
Republican · yes
+ 93 more
Passage, Third Reading
Total
117
Yes
113
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
4
Abstain
0
How they voted (117)
Angie Nixon
Democratic · yes
Tiffany Esposito
Republican · yes
Susan Plasencia
Republican · yes
Kevin Steele
Republican · yes
Meg Weinberger
Republican · yes
Brad Yeager
Republican · yes
Dianne Hart-Lowman
Democratic · yes
Wallace Aristide
Democratic · yes
Danny Nix
Republican · yes
Adam Botana
Republican · yes
Vanessa Oliver
Republican · yes
Christine Hunschofsky
Democratic · yes
Jenna Persons-Mulicka
Republican · not voting
Kevin Chambliss
Democratic · yes
Brian Hodgers
Republican · yes
Daniel Perez
Republican · yes
Rachel Plakon
Republican · yes
Debra Tendrich
Democratic · yes
Fiona McFarland
Republican · yes
Kelly Skidmore
Democratic · yes
Johanna López
Democratic · yes
Demi Busatta
Republican · yes
Jennifer Kincart Jonsson
Republican · yes
Tae Edmonds
Democratic · yes
+ 93 more
Sponsors
Show 112 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Proactive PFAS Management
The bill establishes a state-level regulatory framework for PFAS before federal standards are fully finalized, using the EPA's future standards as a benchmark.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools