The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Resolution to Impeach President Donald J. Trump
Last action · June 24, 2025: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.Sponsors: Al Green and 1 other
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
This resolution formally proposes the impeachment of President Donald J. Trump for alleged abuse of power regarding the unauthorized use of military force against Iran. The measure was submitted to the House of Representatives and subsequently , meaning no further action was taken.
The resolution addresses the constitutional balance of power, specifically whether the President can authorize military strikes without congressional approval, a process that determines the legal limits of executive war-making authority.
- The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the exclusive power to declare war, a power often debated in the context of modern executive military actions. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Donald J. Trump
The resolution formally proposes his impeachment and removal from office.
United States Congress
The resolution asserts that Congress's constitutional war-making authority was usurped by the executive branch.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does it mean that the resolution was 'laid on the table'?
What specific actions triggered this impeachment resolution?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
8 actions- Jun 24, 2025HouseMotion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Jun 24, 2025HouseOn motion to table Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 344 - 79 (Roll no. 175).
- Jun 24, 2025HouseMr. Scott, Austin moved to table the measure.
- Jun 24, 2025HouseConsidered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H2906-2907; text: CR H2906)
- Jun 24, 2025HouseQUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE - Mr. Green (TX) rose to a question of the privileges of the House and offered the resolution. The Chair directed the Clerk to report the resolution. Upon examination of the resolution, the Chair determined that the resolution did constitute a question of the privileges of the House.
- Jun 24, 2025HouseNOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO OFFER RESOLUTION - Mr. Green (TX) notified the House of his intent to offer a privileged resolution pursuant to clause 2(a)(1) of rule IX. The Chair announced that a determination will be made at the time designated for consideration of the resolution.
Show 2 earlier actions
- Jun 24, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Jun 24, 2025HouseSubmitted in House
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Voting Record
Total
423
- Yes
- 344
- No
- 79
- Present
- 0
- Not voting
- 0
- Abstain
- 0
How they voted (423)
399 more members
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Executive War-Making Conflict
The resolution highlights a direct conflict between executive military action and the constitutional requirement for congressional authorization.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.congress.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance95How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy95Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment80Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz85Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
