POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Mississippi Bill HB 946 authorizes full-time reemployment and full benefits for PERS retirees in critical shortage positions

Original title: Retirees; may be employed full time in critical need or shortage positions with PERS employer and draw full benefits.

Last action · February 3, 2026: 02/03 (H) Died In CommitteeSponsor: Jonathan McMillan

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

AN ACT TO AMEND SECTION 25-11-127, MISSISSIPPI CODE OF 1972, TO AUTHORIZE RETIRED MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO BE EMPLOYED IN A POSITION FOR WHICH THE EMPLOYER HAS A CRITICAL NEED FOR OR SHORTAGE OF EMPLOYEES AND DRAW THE FULL AMOUNT OF THE RETIREE'S RETIREMENT ALLOWANCE, DURING WHICH TIME THE RETIREE MAY WORK THE FULL NUMBER OF NORMAL WORKING DAYS FOR THE POSITION AND RECEIVE THE FULL AMOUNT OF THE SALARY IN EFFECT FOR THE POSITION AT THE TIME OF EMPLOYMENT; TO PROVIDE THAT BEFORE A RETIREE MAY BE EMPLOYED IN SUCH A POSITION, THE EMPLOYER MUST PROVIDE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE WITH QUANTIFIABLE NUMBERS TO THE RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF THE EXISTENCE OF A CRITICAL NEED FOR OR SHORTAGE OF EMPLOYEES IN THE EMPLOYER'S AGENCY, DEPARTMENT, INSTITUTION OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION, AND SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT THE EMPLOYEE HAS THE EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE NECESSARY FOR THE POSITION FOR WHICH THERE IS A CRITICAL NEED OR SHORTAGE AND IN WHICH HE OR SHE WILL BE EMPLOYED; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES.

Why it matters

Public agencies facing severe staffing shortages gain statutory authority to rehire retired public servants for full-time duties without reducing their pension payouts, provided strict documentation standards are met.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Public Employees' Retirement System retirees

Retirees meeting critical-need criteria can work full-time hours and receive their full salary alongside their full retirement allowance.

Directly affected

State agencies, departments, institutions, and political subdivisions

Employers must submit quantifiable evidence of staff shortages to the retirement system and pay employer contributions on retiree compensation.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What must an employer prove before hiring a retiree under this bill?
The employer must provide satisfactory evidence with quantifiable numbers showing a critical need or shortage of employees in their agency, department, institution, or , alongside proof of the retiree's education and experience.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Feb 3, 2026House
    02/03 (H) Died In Committee
  2. Jan 16, 2026HouseCommittee
    01/16 (H) Referred To State Affairs;Appropriations A

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Public Employees' Retirement System, Internal Revenue Service
OrganizationPublic Employees' Retirement System“Administers retirement benefits and receives employer contributions and evidence”Map →
OrganizationInternal Revenue Service“Sets federal definitions for prohibited in-service distributions.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

billstatus.ls.state.ms.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record