The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Mississippi Legislature considers $18,500 appropriation for Big Creek fire department equipment
Last action · February 25, 2026: 02/25 (H) Died In CommitteeSponsor: Perry Bailey
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Proposed
House Bill 1949 proposes an $18,500 state general fund to the Town of Big Creek to purchase and a defibrillator for the local volunteer fire department for 2027.
The measure directs state funds to a specific local municipality for emergency response gear, affecting equipment availability for the town's volunteer firefighters starting July 1, 2026.
Who It Would Have Affected
Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Big Creek Volunteer Fire Department
Receives funding for fire turnout clothing and a defibrillator.
Town of Big Creek
Governing authorities receive and manage the appropriated state funds.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much money does HB 1949 appropriate for the Town of Big Creek?
What specific equipment is being funded by this legislation?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
This bill did not become law - Died in committee.
Procedural history
2 actions- Feb 25, 2026House02/25 (H) Died In Committee
- Feb 17, 2026HouseCommittee02/17 (H) Referred To Appropriations A
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
billstatus.ls.state.ms.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance15Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 15)
- Controversy5Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment2Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz5Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
