POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Missouri House Bill 1775 extends timeline for initial meeting in termination of parental rights proceedings

Original title: TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS

Last action · May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H)Sponsor: Phil Amato

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

House Bill 1775 extends the deadline from thirty to sixty days for petitioners to meet with the court after filing a termination of parental rights petition, and changes the responsible party for this meeting from the juvenile officer to the petitioner.

Why it matters

Changes procedural timelines and responsibilities in juvenile court cases, giving petitioners up to sixty days instead of thirty to hold the initial case-management meeting with the court.

Background
  • The General Assembly is the state legislature of Missouri responsible for enacting laws. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

petitioners

Petitioners take on the responsibility of meeting with the court within sixty days after filing a termination of parental rights petition.

Directly affected

juvenile officers

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much time does the petitioner have to meet with the court after filing the petition?
The petitioner has sixty days after filing the petition, an extension from the previous thirty-day limit.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. May 15, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
  2. Jan 8, 2026HouseFloor
    Read Second Time (H)
  3. Jan 7, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read First Time (H)
  4. Dec 1, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Joseph Engler, General Assembly, Phil Amato and 1 more
PersonJoseph Engler“Chief Clerk of the House”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body of the state of Missouri”Map →
PersonPhil Amato“Representative for District 113”Map →
OrganizationHouse“Lower chamber of the General Assembly”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record