The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Pennsylvania directs Public Utility Commission to regulate and eliminate double utility poles
Last action · February 21, 2025: Referred to CONSUMER PROTECTION, TECHNOLOGY AND UTILITIES, Feb. 21, 2025Sponsors: Alec Ryncavage and 20 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
Pennsylvania House Bill 699 requires the Public Utility Commission to update regulations governing double utility poles, establishing mandatory timeframes, owner compensation procedures, and civil penalties for communication and electric companies that delay migrating equipment off outdated poles.
The measure shifts the financial and operational burden of removing abandoned utility poles onto telecom and cable attachers, prohibiting utilities from passing these compliance costs onto everyday ratepayers.
- Double utility poles occur when an old wooden pole remains in place after a replacement pole is installed because communication, cable, or electrical lines have not been transferred over. context
- The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission regulates intrastate rates, services, and safety of public utilities operating within the Commonwealth. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Public utility pole owners
Pole owners gain formal procedures to notify attached entities, require surety bonds, demand compensation for removal costs, and address abandoned facilities.
Attached infrastructure owners
Electric, telephone, and cable entities face mandatory annual registration, strict migration deadlines, potential surety bond requirements, and civil penalties for noncompliance.
Ratepayers
Ratepayers are protected from absorbing any utility costs incurred under this new pole removal and coordination framework.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a double utility pole under this legislation?
Can utility companies pass the costs of removing double poles onto consumers?
What requirements are placed on companies that attach cables or wires to utility poles?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
1 action- Feb 21, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to CONSUMER PROTECTION, TECHNOLOGY AND UTILITIES, Feb. 21, 2025
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Show 16 more sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Prohibition of Attributed Costs to Ratepayers
The bill explicitly shields everyday utility customers from bearing the financial burden of pole migration and removal operations.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.palegis.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy25Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment5Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools