POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Michigan House Bill 5578 expands grounds for modifying child custody when a parent is convicted of sexual offenses against a minor

Original title: Family law: child custody; changing the established custodial environment of a child; expand.

Last action · February 26, 2026: bill electronically reproduced 02/24/2026Sponsors: Jamie Thompson and 4 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Michigan House Bill 5578 would allow courts to change an established child custody environment if a parent was convicted of criminal sexual conduct against a minor or committed nonconsensual sexual penetration, even if the nonoffending parent previously entered into a custody agreement knowing of the conviction. The bill also protects deploying military parents by prohibiting courts from considering deployment absences in best-interest determinations and requires the reinstatement of prior custody orders upon a parent's return. Additionally, the measure applies retroactively to final custody orders and judgments issued on or after January 1, 2022.

Why it matters

Families involved in custody disputes face new legal standards regarding how prior knowledge of criminal sexual conduct affects custody agreements, and deploying military service members receive explicit protections preventing custody modifications based on their absence.

Background
  • Michigan 1970 PA 91 is the foundational state statute governing child custody disputes, known as the Child Custody Act of 1970. context
  • The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act provides federal protections for military personnel, including temporary stays of civil court proceedings during active deployment. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Parents involved in child custody disputes

Parents face new statutory rules regarding custody modifications following sex offense convictions and enhanced protections during military deployments.

Directly affected

Children subject to custody orders

Children may experience changes in custodial environments based on new criteria regarding parental convictions for sexual offenses against minors.

Directly affected

Deploying military service members

Service members are protected from having their deployment absences used against them in custody determinations and are guaranteed reinstatement of prior custody orders upon return.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a custody agreement be changed if one parent knew about a sex offense conviction before signing?
Yes. The bill explicitly allows courts to change an if the offending parent was convicted of criminal sexual conduct against a minor, even if the nonoffending parent originally entered into the custody agreement with knowledge of that conviction.
How does the bill protect parents who are deployed in the military?
The bill prohibits courts from considering a parent's absence due to military deployment or active duty when making a best-interest-of-the-child determination, and requires courts to reinstate the pre-deployment custody order upon the parent's return.
How far back does this legislation apply?
The bill is retroactive and applies to all final child custody orders and judgments of the circuit court or appeals court issued on or after January 1, 2022.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 26, 2026House
    bill electronically reproduced 02/24/2026
  2. Feb 24, 2026HouseCommittee
    referred to Committee on Families and Veterans
  3. Feb 24, 2026HouseIntroduced
    read a first time
  4. Feb 24, 2026HouseIntroduced
    introduced by Representative Rep. Jamie Thompson

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift100% confidence

Retroactive Application to Child Custody Judgments

The bill applies retroactively to final child custody orders and judgments issued on or after January 1, 2022, impacting existing legal arrangements.

Connected Entities

Karl Bohnak, Josh Schriver, Luke Meerman and 2 more
PersonKarl Bohnak“Cosponsor of House Bill 5578”Map →
PersonJosh Schriver“Cosponsor of House Bill 5578”Map →
PersonLuke Meerman“Cosponsor of House Bill 5578”Map →
PersonJamie Thompson“Primary sponsor of House Bill 5578”Map →
PersonAngela Rigas“Cosponsor of House Bill 5578”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record