The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Michigan House Bill 5578 expands grounds for modifying child custody when a parent is convicted of sexual offenses against a minor
Last action · February 26, 2026: bill electronically reproduced 02/24/2026Sponsors: Jamie Thompson and 4 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
Michigan House Bill 5578 would allow courts to change an established child custody environment if a parent was convicted of criminal sexual conduct against a minor or committed nonconsensual sexual penetration, even if the nonoffending parent previously entered into a custody agreement knowing of the conviction. The bill also protects deploying military parents by prohibiting courts from considering deployment absences in best-interest determinations and requires the reinstatement of prior custody orders upon a parent's return. Additionally, the measure applies retroactively to final custody orders and judgments issued on or after January 1, 2022.
Families involved in custody disputes face new legal standards regarding how prior knowledge of criminal sexual conduct affects custody agreements, and deploying military service members receive explicit protections preventing custody modifications based on their absence.
- Michigan 1970 PA 91 is the foundational state statute governing child custody disputes, known as the Child Custody Act of 1970. context
- The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act provides federal protections for military personnel, including temporary stays of civil court proceedings during active deployment. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Parents involved in child custody disputes
Parents face new statutory rules regarding custody modifications following sex offense convictions and enhanced protections during military deployments.
Children subject to custody orders
Children may experience changes in custodial environments based on new criteria regarding parental convictions for sexual offenses against minors.
Deploying military service members
Service members are protected from having their deployment absences used against them in custody determinations and are guaranteed reinstatement of prior custody orders upon return.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a custody agreement be changed if one parent knew about a sex offense conviction before signing?
How does the bill protect parents who are deployed in the military?
How far back does this legislation apply?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
4 actions- Feb 26, 2026Housebill electronically reproduced 02/24/2026
- Feb 24, 2026HouseCommitteereferred to Committee on Families and Veterans
- Feb 24, 2026HouseIntroducedread a first time
- Feb 24, 2026HouseIntroducedintroduced by Representative Rep. Jamie Thompson
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Retroactive Application to Child Custody Judgments
The bill applies retroactively to final child custody orders and judgments issued on or after January 1, 2022, impacting existing legal arrangements.
Connected Entities
Sources
legislature.mi.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance65How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy40Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment15Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz30Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
