POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofTaxes →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut bill proposes personal income tax credit for Medicare and Medicare Advantage premiums

Original title: AN ACT ESTABLISHING A MEDICARE PREMIUMS TAX CREDIT AGAINST THE PERSONAL INCOME TAX.

Last action · February 4, 2026: Referred to Joint Committee on Finance, Revenue and BondingSponsors: Jason Perillo and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Connecticut lawmakers are considering a new credit for taxpayers who pay premiums for Medicare and plans.

Why it matters

Taxpayers enrolled in Medicare or could see a reduction in their state income tax liability based on the cost of their plan premiums.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Taxpayers paying Medicare or Medicare Advantage premiums

Taxpayers who pay premiums for Medicare and Medicare Advantage plans become eligible for a credit against the personal income tax.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible for the proposed tax credit?
Taxpayers who pay premiums for Medicare and plans during a taxable year.
Which tax is affected by this bill?
The governed by chapter 229 of the general statutes.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Feb 4, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Finance, Revenue and Bonding

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Ben McGorty, General Assembly, Jason Perillo and 1 more
PersonBen McGorty“Representative representing the 122nd District and cosponsor.”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“The legislative body convened for the February Session, 2026.”Map →
PersonJason Perillo“Senator representing the 21st District who introduced Proposed Bill No. 42.”Map →
OrganizationFinance, Revenue and Bonding“Joint committee to which Proposed Bill No. 42 was referred.”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy20
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record