POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Massachusetts House Bill 3008 allows non-contiguous farmland within 10 miles or a single municipality to qualify for agricultural land classification

Original title: An Act relative to non-contiguous farm land

Last action · November 12, 2025: Read second and ordered to a third readingSponsors: Jim Arciero and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Official description

By Representative Arciero of Westford, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3008) of James Arciero and others relative to non-contiguous farm land. Revenue.

Why it matters

Qualifying agricultural parcels under Chapter 61A changes property tax assessment methods for landowners whose farming operations span multiple separate plots, provided the total acreage and distance criteria are met.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

agricultural property owners

Landowners with separate farm parcels totaling at least five acres within a 10-mile radius or single municipality gain the right to apply for agricultural land classification.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the minimum acreage required to apply for non-contiguous farmland classification?
The owner must hold a total of not less than five acres across two or more areas.
How close do the separate parcels need to be to qualify?
The parcels must be within a 10-mile radius of one another or located within the confines of a single municipality.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently on floor. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Passed.

Procedural history

7 actions
  1. Nov 12, 2025House
    Read second and ordered to a third reading
  2. Nov 12, 2025House
    Rules suspended
  3. Nov 12, 2025House
    Committee reported that the matter be placed in the Orders of the Day for the next sitting
  4. Oct 22, 2025HouseCommittee
    Bill reported favorably by committee and referred to the committee on House Steering, Policy and Scheduling
  5. Jul 1, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 07/15/2025 from 10:00 AM-01:00 PM in A-1
  6. Feb 27, 2025Senate
    Senate concurred
Show 1 earlier action
  1. Feb 27, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Revenue

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

George A. Sanders, Sr., Kelly Pease, Colleen Garry and 2 more
PersonGeorge A. Sanders, Sr.“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonKelly Pease“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonColleen Garry“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonSteven Ouellette“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonJim Arciero“Representative of Westford who filed House Bill No. 3008”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record