POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Indiana Senate Bill 216 Requires Compensation for Business Losses in Certain Condemnation Proceedings

Original title: Eminent domain.

Last action · January 15, 2026: Committee report: amend do pass adopted; reassigned to Committee on AppropriationsSponsors: James Buck and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Indiana Senate Bill 216 requires local government units that issue s to mandate that business property owners be eligible for compensation for business losses ("loss of a ") during eminent domain or proceedings filed after March 31, 2026. The legislation establishes legal standards for determining going concern damages, mandates specific qualifications for court-appointed appraisers when claims are made, and sets strict timelines for property owners to notify the court.

Why it matters

Business operators leasing or owning property taken through local government tied to s gain a statutory right to claim financial damages for lost goodwill and customer base, altering compensation calculations and municipal acquisition costs.

Background
  • Eminent domain is the power of the state or local government to take private property for public use, provided just compensation is paid to the owner. context
  • Indiana's General Assembly regularly considers adjustments to property acquisition statutes, notice requirements, and appraiser qualifications under Title 32 of the Indiana Code. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Business owners and commercial lessees

Eligible business operators gain the explicit statutory right to claim financial compensation for loss of a going concern and customer base during local government condemnations tied to forgivable loans.

Directly affected

Units of local government

Municipalities and local units issuing forgivable loans must incorporate new mandate requirements into condemnation actions, alter appraisal appointments, and potentially face higher acquisition costs.

Directly affected

Property appraisers

Appraisers appointed in qualifying condemnation cases must evaluate going concern values and ensure specific qualification standards are met when claims are filed.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible to claim compensation for the loss of a going concern under this bill?
Property tax payers, recorded titleholders, and lessees who operate a business on the real property are eligible, provided the is conducted by a unit of local government that provides s and the proceedings are filed after March 31, 2026.
What is the deadline for a business owner to notify the court of a going concern claim?
An owner must notify the court or works board of their intent to claim compensation for loss of a not later than ninety (90) days after the date of the first service or publication of the acquisition notice.
Can a condemnor avoid paying going concern damages?
Yes, if the condemnor establishes by a preponderance of the evidence that the loss was not caused by the property taking, could be reasonably prevented through relocation or prudent business steps, or duplicates other awarded compensation.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Jan 15, 2026SenateFloor
    Committee report: amend do pass adopted; reassigned to Committee on Appropriations
  2. Jan 8, 2026SenateIntroduced
    First reading: referred to Committee on Local Government
  3. Jan 8, 2026Senate
    Authored by Senators Buck, Niemeyer

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Conditional Eminent Domain Mandate Tied to Municipal Loans

The legislation uniquely ties eminent domain compensation rules to whether a local government unit provides forgivable loans to individuals or businesses.

Connected Entities

Rick Niemeyer, Senate Committee on Local Government, General Assembly and 2 more
PersonRick Niemeyer“Co-sponsor of Senate Bill 216”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Local Government“Committee that reviewed, amended, and reported favorably on the bill”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Legislative body of the State of Indiana”Map →
PersonJames Buck“Primary sponsor and committee chairperson of the Senate Committee on Local Gover”Map →
OrganizationSenate Committee on Appropriations“Committee to which the bill was reassigned after committee report”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record