POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

New Jersey S 4847 clarifies admissibility of future medical expenses in car crash lawsuits

Original title: Clarifies circumstances when future medical treatment expenses are "collectible" personal injury protection benefits in civil actions for recovery of damages for bodily injury.

Last action · October 19, 2026: Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Commerce CommitteeSponsor: Joseph A. Lagana

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

This bill allows injured motorists to introduce evidence of future medical treatment expenses in civil lawsuits for bodily injury, clarifying that such expenses are not "collectible" merely because insurance coverage limits remain theoretically available.

Why it matters

The measure determines whether auto accident victims can present future medical cost estimates to a jury in negligence trials, directly affecting what financial evidence is admissible when seeking damages from an at-fault driver.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

injured motorists

Motorists involved in automobile negligence actions are permitted to introduce evidence of unrendered future medical treatment expenses in civil court.

Directly affected

automobile insurance carriers

Insurers providing personal injury protection coverage may assert an offset or credit against future benefit applications if an injured person recovers compensation for future medical expenses in a civil action.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this bill change about car accident lawsuits?
It clarifies that future medical treatment expenses cannot be barred from evidence in a civil bodily injury lawsuit simply because personal injury protection insurance limits are theoretically available to pay for them in the future.
When is a medical expense considered collectible under the bill?
An expense is collectible only if the care has already been rendered or provided, has been billed or is billable under applicable insurance rules and fee schedules, and is payable or paid under personal injury protection coverage.
Does the bill allow a person to collect twice for the same medical expenses?
No. The bill prohibits duplicate recovery and allows personal injury protection carriers to assert an offset or credit against future PIP benefits if the injured person has already recovered compensation for those same future medical expenses in a civil action.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Oct 19, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Commerce Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

P.L.1983, c.362, P.L.1988, c.119, P.L.1972, c.70 and 5 more
otherP.L.1983, c.362“Statute referenced regarding automobile insurance and exclusions”Map →
otherP.L.1988, c.119“Statute referenced regarding automobile medical fee schedules”Map →
otherP.L.1972, c.70“Statute being amended regarding personal injury protection benefits”Map →
PersonJoseph A. Lagana“Senator sponsoring S 4847 representing District 38”Map →
locationNew Jersey“State where the legislation is introduced”Map →
otherP.L.1998, c.21“Statute referenced regarding basic automobile insurance policy medical expense b”Map →
otherP.L.2019, c.245“Prior version reference of the amended section”Map →
otherP.L.2003, c.89“Statute referenced regarding special automobile insurance policy benefits”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record