POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Indiana House Bill 1143 Requires Workers to Pay Local Income Tax Where They Work and Live

Original title: Local option income taxes.

Last action · January 5, 2026: First reading: referred to Committee on Ways and MeansSponsor: Michael Karickhoff

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

House Bill 1143 requires individuals who reside in a county with a local income tax and work in a different county to pay a local income tax in their workplace county as well. The workplace county tax rate is set at twenty-five percent of the sum of the local income tax rates imposed on resident taxpayers in that county. Taxpayers receive a credit against the tax imposed in their workplace county equal to the amount of tax paid in their county of residence, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.

Why it matters

Commuters who live in one Indiana county and work in another face a new tax obligation in their workplace county, offset by a credit against the tax owed in their home county.

Background
  • Local option income taxes in Indiana are governed under IC 6-3.6, allowing counties to impose income taxes on residents and certain workers. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Cross-county commuters

Individuals who live and work in different Indiana counties are subject to local income tax obligations in both jurisdictions, accompanied by a tax credit.

Directly affected

Local governments

Counties where taxpayers work gain authority to impose a local income tax on nonresident workers at a rate equal to 25 percent of resident rates.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is required to pay a local income tax in a county where they do not live?
Individuals who reside in a county with a local income tax and maintain their principal place of business or employment in a different county must pay a local income tax in their workplace county.
How is the local income tax rate calculated for a taxpayer who works in a county different from where they reside?
The tax rate in the workplace county is twenty-five percent of the sum of the local income tax rates imposed on s who reside in that workplace county, excluding rates imposed under IC 6-3.6-7.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 5, 2026HouseIntroduced
    First reading: referred to Committee on Ways and Means
  2. Jan 5, 2026House
    Authored by Representative Karickhoff

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Local Income Tax Jurisdiction

The bill shifts from a purely residence-based local income tax structure to one that captures workplace county revenue from nonresident commuters.

Connected Entities

General Assembly, Michael Karickhoff, Committee on Ways and Means
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Enacting body of the state legislature”Map →
PersonMichael Karickhoff“State Representative sponsoring House Bill 1143”Map →
OrganizationCommittee on Ways and Means“House committee reviewing the bill”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 60)
  • Controversy50
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record