POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Texas HB 1323 revises academic accountability indicators and standards for school districts

Original title: Relating to a standard and set of indicators in the academic accountability system.

Last action · March 10, 2025: Referred to Public EducationSponsor: Gina Hinojosa

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Texas HB 1323 updates the by modifying the indicators used by the commissioner to measure school district and campus performance, including student achievement, school progress, and closing achievement gaps. The legislation applies beginning with the 2023-2024 school year and outlines specific criteria for evaluating college and career readiness, student growth, and demographic performance differentials.

Background
  • The Texas Education Code governs the operation of the state's public education system, including academic accountability and student assessment standards. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

School districts

School districts must comply with revised academic accountability standards and indicators measuring student performance.

Directly affected

Students

Student assessment results, college readiness benchmarks, and graduation outcomes are utilized to evaluate campus and district performance ratings.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What domains are used to evaluate school districts and campuses?
Districts and campuses are evaluated based on three domains of indicators: student achievement, school progress, and closing the gaps.
How does the bill handle high-performing schools when indicators change?
An indicator that measures improvements in student achievement cannot negatively affect the review of a district or campus if it is already achieving at the highest level for that indicator.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Mar 10, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to Public Education
  2. Mar 10, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Read first time
  3. Nov 14, 2024HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift90% confidence

Refinement of Accountability Indicators

The bill updates the statutory framework for evaluating school districts by detailing specific high school achievement measures such as industry certifications and dual enrollment courses.

Connected Entities

State Board of Education, Education Code, Every Student Succeeds Act and 2 more
OrganizationState Board of Education“Approves practicums and internships for high school indicators”Map →
OrganizationEducation Code“Statutory code being amended”Map →
OrganizationEvery Student Succeeds Act“Federal act governing high school graduation rate standards”Map →
PersonGina Hinojosa“Bill author in the lower house”Map →
OrganizationTexas Higher Education Coordinating Board“Prescribes TSI college readiness benchmarks”Map →

Sources

Open source document

capitol.texas.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record