POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Maryland Senate Bill 63 Requires Contract Adjustments for Long-Term Construction and Security Contracts

Original title: State Procurement - Construction and Services - Contract Modification

Last action · January 19, 2026: Hearing 1/28 at 1:00 p.m.Sponsor: Cory McCray

Companion · HB 74same policy, House version
Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Maryland Senate Bill 63 requires state s for construction or security services lasting 3 years or longer and valued over $2,000,000 to include clauses modifying contracts for increased labor costs resulting from statutory changes or collective bargaining, contingent on approval by the Chief Procurement Officer.

Why it matters

Contractors and service providers managing large, multi-year state construction or security projects will be able to adjust contract values to account for mandated increases in worker pay and benefits, while state agencies must secure approval from the Chief Procurement Officer for these modifications starting October 1, 2026.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State Contractors

Contractors holding construction or security service contracts lasting 3 years or more and valued over $2,000,000 must include adjustment clauses and can modify contracts for increased labor costs.

Directly affected

Chief Procurement Officer

Must review and approve any contract modifications made due to increased compensation or benefit costs.

Key Facts

  • Applies to state procurement contracts for construction or security services that are 3 years or more in duration and valued at greater than $2,000,000.
  • Construction contracts must include a clause requiring contract modification for equitable adjustment for increased costs for compensation and benefits resulting from statutory changes increasing required compensation or benefits.
  • Security services contracts must include a clause requiring contract modification for equitable adjustments due to increased compensation and benefits from statutory changes or collective bargaining.
  • Any contract modified under these provisions is contingent on approval by the Chief Procurement Officer.
Show all 5 facts
  • The Act takes effect on October 1, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which contracts are affected by Senate Bill 63?
The bill affects state s for construction or security services that last for 3 years or more and are valued at greater than $2,000,000.
What triggers a contract modification under this bill?
Modifications are triggered by increased costs for compensation and benefits resulting from statutory changes or, in the case of security services, collective bargaining.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently filed. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Committee.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Jan 19, 2026Senate
    Hearing 1/28 at 1:00 p.m.
  2. Jan 15, 2026Senate
    Hearing canceled
  3. Jan 15, 2026Senate
    Hearing 1/21 at 10:00 a.m.
  4. Jan 14, 2026SenateIntroduced
    First Reading Budget and Taxation
  5. Oct 17, 2025SenateIntroduced
    Pre-filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Chief Procurement Officer, Cory McCray
OrganizationChief Procurement Officer“Required to approve contract modifications made under the bill”Map →
PersonCory McCray“Senator sponsoring Senate Bill 63”Map →

Sources

Open source document

mgaleg.maryland.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance60
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record