POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Louisiana requires businesses to disclose AI interactions and allows consumer lawsuits for deceptive chatbots

Original title: CONSUMERS/PROTECTION: Provides for consumer protection practices for customers engaging with artificial intelligence (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)

Last action · March 9, 2026: Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Commerce.Sponsor: Mandie Landry

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Louisiana House Bill 425 makes it an unfair or deceptive trade practice for any person, organization, or corporation to interact with consumers via an or chatbot without providing clear and conspicuous notice that the consumer is not speaking to a human.

Why it matters

Consumers can sue businesses for actual damages plus up to $1,000 in , while the state attorney general can seek injunctions and civil penalties reaching up to $5 million.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

consumers in Louisiana

Consumers gain the right to clear disclosures when interacting with automated systems and the ability to file civil lawsuits for undisclosed AI interactions.

Directly affected

corporations, organizations, or persons engaging in commercial transactions

Businesses must update their customer communication practices to include clear notifications when using automated systems or face civil liability, attorney general injunctions, and financial penalties.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggers a violation under this bill?
A violation occurs when a business engages in a commercial transaction with a consumer using an or chatbot without providing clear and conspicuous notice that the consumer is communicating with a computer rather than a human being.
What penalties can businesses face for failing to disclose AI use?
Businesses can face consumer lawsuits for actual damages plus up to $1,000 in (or up to $10 million in a class action), attorney general injunctions, and civil penalties of up to $5 million.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Mar 9, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Commerce.
  2. Feb 27, 2026House
    First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.
  3. Feb 25, 2026House
    Prefiled.
  4. Feb 25, 2026HouseCommittee
    Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Commerce.

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of AI Disclosure Mandate

The bill integrates artificial intelligence interactions directly into unfair trade practice statutes, creating specific statutory damages and civil penalties for hidden automated communications.

Connected Entities

House Committee on Commerce, Mandie Landry
OrganizationHouse Committee on Commerce“Committee to which the bill was referred”Map →
PersonMandie Landry“Representative who sponsored House Bill 425”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legis.la.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz60
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record