POLISCOPE
Back to feed

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Local Impact

Code Enforcement Case: 6368 Safford Terrace

Original title: (GW), Dennis & Monnine Spellman, 6368 Safford Terrace 59-1(b)(4) NPCC - Prohibited parking (Inoperable red vehicle parked in front yard.)

Record date · February 26, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Does

This document outlines a code enforcement case regarding a prohibited vehicle parked at 6368 Safford Terrace. The property owners are cited for having an inoperable red vehicle parked in their front yard.

Why it matters

The property owners, Dennis and Monnine Spellman, are subject to a code enforcement hearing regarding a violation of local parking ordinances that restrict the storage of s on residential property.

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Dennis and Monnine Spellman

As property owners, they are the subjects of a code enforcement hearing regarding a vehicle parking violation.

Key Facts

  • The case involves a violation of ordinance 59-1(b)(4) NPCC regarding prohibited parking.
  • The specific violation is an inoperable red vehicle parked in the front yard of the property.
  • The case is filed under number CECASE-25-03067.
  • The matter is scheduled for a 1st Hearing Case.
Show all 5 facts
  • The document was introduced on December 22, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the violation at 6368 Safford Terrace?
The property is cited for having an inoperable red vehicle parked in the front yard, which violates ordinance .
What is the status of this case?
The case is currently in draft status and is set for a first hearing.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sources

Open source document

webapi.legistar.com

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance10
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy5
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz5
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record