POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Michigan House Bill 5581 caps local minimum dwelling size requirements at 500 square feet

Original title: Land use: zoning and growth management; minimum home size requirements; limit.

Last action · May 14, 2026: Rep. Sharon MacDonell removed as cosponsorSponsors: Tom Kunse and 22 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Local units of government would be prohibited from enforcing a minimum dwelling area requirement greater than 500 square feet under a new provision added to the Michigan zoning enabling act.

Why it matters

Property owners and builders statewide would face a state-mandated ceiling on local floor-area rules, altering what municipalities can require for residential construction.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

local unit of government

Local units of government are restricted from enforcing residential minimum floor area requirements that exceed 500 square feet.

Directly affected

property owners

Property owners are subject to a state-level cap on the minimum home size mandates that local municipalities can enforce.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the maximum minimum home size a local government can require under this bill?
A cannot impose a minimum area requirement greater than 500 square feet for a dwelling.
Which act does this bill amend?
The bill amends the Michigan zoning enabling act (2006 PA 110).

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

8 actions
  1. May 14, 2026House
    Rep. Sharon MacDonell removed as cosponsor
  2. Mar 18, 2026House
    Rep. Jimmie Wilson Jr. removed as cosponsor
  3. Mar 10, 2026House
    Rep. Helena Scott removed as cosponsor
  4. Mar 3, 2026House
    Rep. Brenda Carter removed as cosponsor
  5. Feb 26, 2026House
    bill electronically reproduced 02/24/2026
  6. Feb 24, 2026HouseCommittee
    referred to Committee on Government Operations
Show 2 earlier actions
  1. Feb 24, 2026HouseIntroduced
    read a first time
  2. Feb 24, 2026HouseIntroduced
    introduced by Representative Rep. Tom Kunse

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Sharon MacDonell, Kimberly Edwards, Stephen Wooden and 9 more
PersonSharon MacDonell“Representative removed as cosponsor”Map →
PersonKimberly Edwards“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonStephen Wooden“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonNoah Arbit“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonCynthia Neeley“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonTom Kunse“Sponsor of House Bill No. 5581”Map →
PersonJason Hoskins“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonJasper Martus“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonCarol Glanville“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonCarrie Rheingans“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonJason Morgan“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonKristian Grant“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.mi.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record