The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Pennsylvania Bill Requires Cancer Warning Labels on Alcohol Containers
Last action · February 3, 2025: Referred to LIQUOR CONTROL, Feb. 3, 2025Sponsors: José Giral and 9 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
House Bill 457 requires alcoholic beverage and alcohol containers ready for shipment or possessed in to display a conspicuous label warning that there is a direct link between alcohol and fatal cancers, effective in 60 days.
Wholesale distributors and manufacturers must alter container labeling practices to include explicit cancer warnings, affecting commercial compliance and wholesale inventory management across the state.
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
alcohol manufacturers and wholesalers
Must attach and maintain new cancer warning labels on all wholesale alcohol containers ready for shipment.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is required to maintain the cancer warning labels on containers?
What exact wording must the new warning label contain?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
1 action- Feb 3, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to LIQUOR CONTROL, Feb. 3, 2025
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
www.palegis.us
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance50How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz35Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
