POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Connecticut requires contracting board staffing minimums, expanded privatization business cases, and successor-contractor disqualifications

Original title: AN ACT IMPLEMENTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE STATE CONTRACTING STANDARDS BOARD.

Last action · May 5, 2026: On Consent CalendarSponsors: Nicholas Menapace and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Beginning July 1, 2026, the State Contracting Standards Board must employ at least five full-time staff, state agencies must include comprehensive risk and workforce impacts in privatization business cases, and agencies are barred from awarding contracts to successor entities sharing continuity with disqualified contractors.

Why it matters

State contracting agencies face new compliance and screening duties before awarding public contracts, and the Department of Administrative Services incurs an estimated $424,075 in first-year implementation costs.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State Contracting Standards Board

The board receives a mandatory minimum staffing floor of five full-time employees and protection of its appropriations estimates and allotments from gubernatorial reduction.

Directly affected

Department of Administrative Services

The department incurs new fiscal and administrative responsibilities, including hiring two new employees, updating procurement systems, documenting bidding waivers, and posting them on the portal.

Directly affected

State contracting agencies

Agencies must revise privatization business cases to include extensive risk, workforce, and equity analyses, and must conduct background inquiries to screen out successor entities of disqualified contractors.

Directly affected

Prospective state contractors and bidders

Bidders are subject to expanded successor-disqualification screening and must receive notices of their rights under state contracting law.

Key Facts

  • Beginning July 1, 2026, the State Contracting Standards Board must employ at least five full-time employees.
  • The Governor is prohibited from reducing allotment requisitions or allotments in force concerning the State Contracting Standards Board.
  • Agency procurement officers must include a notice of bidder rights under section 4e-36 in solicitations and advise contractors and unsuccessful bidders of these rights starting July 1, 2026.
  • State agencies proposing a privatization contract must prepare a business case including risk assessments, transition plans, and impact analyses on protected classes and historical inequities.
Show all 8 facts
  • The Department of Administrative Services must document in writing any waiver of competitive bidding for minor or emergency purchases of $10,000 or less and post it on the State Contracting Portal within five business days.
  • State contracting agencies must screen bidders to determine if they are successor contractors that are 'substantially the same entity' as a disqualified contractor.
  • The presence of two or more specified continuity factors creates a rebuttable presumption that an entity is substantially the same as a disqualified contractor.
  • The Department of Administrative Services incurs a cost of $424,075 in fiscal year 2027 and $224,075 annually beginning in fiscal year 2028 to update systems and hire two new employees.

Frequently Asked Questions

What new requirements apply when a state agency considers privatizing a service?
The agency must prepare an expanded business case that includes an analysis of service quality under privatization, a risk assessment covering service continuity, a workforce transition plan, an analysis of impacts on protected classes and historical inequities, and an analysis of qualitative impacts on the existing state workforce.
How does the bill prevent disqualified contractors from winning state contracts by rebranding?
The bill defines a '' standard and requires state contracting agencies to screen bidders for continuity of ownership, management, key personnel, assets, and operations. If an agency identifies possible continuity with a disqualified contractor, it must refer the matter to the State Contracting Standards Board before awarding the contract.
What are the rules regarding competitive bidding waivers for small purchases?
For minor, nonrecurring, or emergency purchases of $10,000 or less, the State Contracting Standards Board and the Commissioner of Administrative Services may waive competitive bidding. The Commissioner must document any such waiver in writing and post it on the State Contracting Portal within five business days.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · passed the Senate.

Procedural history

11 actions
  1. May 5, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    On Consent Calendar
  2. May 5, 2026SenateFloor
    Senate Passed
  3. Apr 9, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    File Number 574
  4. Apr 9, 2026Senate
    Senate Calendar Number 340
  5. Apr 9, 2026Senate
    Favorable Report, Tabled for the Calendar, Senate
  6. Apr 9, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Reported Out of Legislative Commissioners' Office
Show 5 earlier actions
  1. Apr 2, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Referred to Office of Legislative Research and Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/08/26 5:00 PM
  2. Mar 23, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Filed with Legislative Commissioners' Office
  3. Mar 23, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Joint Favorable Substitute
  4. Mar 9, 2026Connecticut General Assembly
    Public Hearing 03/13
  5. Mar 6, 2026Connecticut General AssemblyCommittee
    Referred to Joint Committee on Government Administration and Elections

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expanded Scope of Disqualification Evasion Prevention

The bill establishes a codified multi-factor test ('substantially the same entity') to prevent disqualified contractors from circumventing bans via corporate restructuring, rebranding, or bankruptcy.

Connected Entities

State Contracting Standards Board, Department of Administrative Services, State Comptroller and 1 more
OrganizationState Contracting Standards Board“Independent executive branch board responsible for state contracting oversight.”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Administrative Services“State department tasked with administrative procedures and posting competitive b”Map →
OrganizationState Comptroller“State office administering centralized fringe benefit costs.”Map →
OrganizationOffice of Policy and Management“State office receiving expenditure estimate requirements from the contracting bo”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record