POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

New Jersey bill grants venue change in family court actions to litigants who testify on Superior Court nominees

Original title: Provides parties offering public remarks before Senate committees concerning qualifications of Superior Court judge nominees, upon motion, change of venue on family actions, to vicinage other than vicinage where nominee is assigned if confirmed.

Last action · January 13, 2026: Introduced, Referred to Assembly Judiciary CommitteeSponsor: Auth, Robert

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

Litigants in family court actions who publicly comment on the character or qualifications of a Superior Court judge nominee before a Senate committee may request and receive a change of venue to a different . The venue transfer applies to all further related family proceedings away from the district where the confirmed judge would be assigned. The measure takes effect immediately upon enactment.

Why it matters

Parties involved in family court proceedings gain a statutory right to request a relocation of their active legal case if they publicly testify regarding a judicial nominee assigned to their current district.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

parties to family actions or proceedings

Litigants in family court gain the statutory right to request a venue transfer for their cases if they publicly testify on judicial nominees.

Directly affected

Superior Court judge nominees

Nominees are subject to public testimony by litigants who may subsequently seek to move their active court cases out of the nominee's assigned district.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible to request a change of venue under this bill?
A party to a family action or proceeding in the of the Superior Court who presents oral remarks at a public Senate committee meeting concerning the character or qualifications of a Superior Court judge nominee.
Which court decides the motion for a change of venue?
The motion is made to the same court in which the party's previously instituted family action or proceeding was last adjudicated or awaits further consideration.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced, Referred to Assembly Judiciary Committee

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Auth, RobertPrimary sponsorNo profile match

Connected Entities

Robert Auth, General Assembly, Superior Court and 1 more
PersonRobert Auth“Assemblyman sponsoring Assembly Bill No. 508”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“legislative body of the State of New Jersey”Map →
OrganizationSuperior Court“court whose judges are nominated and reviewed”Map →
OrganizationSenate“reviews gubernatorial nominees to be judges”Map →

Sources

Open source document

njleg.state.nj.us

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record