POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Ohio Senate Bill 467 modifies requirements for marked police vehicles in traffic law enforcement

Original title: Modify when marked police car used for traffic law enforcement

Last action · September 30, 2026: Referred to Armed Services, Veterans Affairs and Public SafetySponsor: Thomas Patton

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Ohio SB 467 modifies the conditions under which a marked police car must be used by s or state highway patrol officers for enforcing traffic laws and civil traffic law violations recorded by photo-monitoring devices.

Why it matters

Determines whether law enforcement officers must use distinctly marked vehicles when enforcing misdemeanor traffic offenses or civil traffic violations recorded by automated devices.

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

State Highway Patrol

The superintendent must specify distinctive markings or colors for state highway patrol vehicles, and officers must operate vehicles meeting these statutory requirements.

Directly affected

Peace officers

Officers enforcing traffic laws for misdemeanors or photo-recorded civil violations must use vehicles that meet the specified marking and equipment standards.

Directly affected

Motorists

Drivers are subject to traffic enforcement by officers operating under updated vehicle marking requirements.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Senate Bill 467 change?
It modifies section 4549.13 of the Revised Code regarding when a marked police car must be used for traffic law enforcement.
Which vehicles and officers are affected by this bill?
The bill applies to members of the state highway patrol and any other whose exclusive or main purpose while on duty is enforcing motor vehicle or traffic laws for misdemeanor offenses or civil traffic violations recorded by photo-monitoring devices.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Sep 30, 2026SenateCommittee
    Referred to Armed Services, Veterans Affairs and Public Safety
  2. Aug 5, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Introduced

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Thomas Patton, Revised Code, 4549.13 and 1 more
PersonThomas Patton“Senator, District 24, sponsor of SB 467”Map →
OrganizationRevised Code“Ohio Revised Code section being amended”Map →
other4549.13“Section of the Revised Code being amended”Map →
OrganizationState Highway Patrol“State law enforcement agency referenced in the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.legislature.ohio.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance45
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy15
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record