The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Iowa Senate File 2072 Mandates Firing and Penalties for State and School DEI Violations
Last action · January 27, 2026: Subcommittee: Salmon, Green, and Quirmbach. S.J. 148 .Sponsor: Sandy Salmon
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
Senate File 2072 mandates that state entities and school districts terminate the employment of any person—and their aware supervisor—who violates laws regarding prohibited diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) offices or restricted curriculum concepts if a plaintiff or the attorney general prevails in a civil action. The measure also requires the revocation of professional licenses for terminated personnel and imposes civil penalties ranging from $50,000 to $100,000 on entities based on their total budget size.
Enforcement actions that find state agencies or school districts in violation of DEI and curriculum restrictions will trigger automatic employee terminations, professional license revocations, and direct civil penalties deposited into the state general fund.
- Iowa Code section 279.74 governs restrictions on curriculum, training, and concepts related to demographic stereotyping and political ideology in school districts. context
- Current Iowa law prohibits state entities from spending public funds to establish or staff diversity, equity, and inclusion offices or officers. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
State and School Employees
Employees face mandatory job termination and professional license revocation if found in violation of DEI or curriculum restrictions or if they are aware supervisors who failed to prevent violations.
School Districts and State Entities
Entities are subject to civil penalties ranging from $50,000 to $100,000 and mandatory personnel terminations if a plaintiff or the attorney general prevails in a legal action.
Students and Alumni
Students and alumni are granted standing to bring civil actions for injunctive relief against school districts alleging curriculum violations.
Key Facts
- If the attorney general or a plaintiff prevails in a civil action against a state entity or school district for violating DEI or curriculum laws, the entity must terminate the employment of the violating person.
- If the supervisor of the violating employee was aware of the violation and failed to take preventative action, the state entity or school district must also terminate the supervisor's employment.
- Professional licenses, certificates, or authorizations required for terminated positions must be revoked by the original issuing entity, including the board of educational examiners and the supreme court for attorneys.
- State entities and school districts with a total budget under $100 million in the last fiscal year must pay a $50,000 civil penalty deposited into the state general fund upon an adverse ruling.
Show all 8 facts
- Entities with a total budget of $100 million or more must pay a $100,000 civil penalty upon an adverse ruling.
- The attorney general may bring an action for a writ of mandamus to compel school district compliance with section 279.74.
- Students, alumni, or employees may bring a civil action for injunctive relief against school districts alleging violations of restricted curriculum concepts.
- Civil actions against school districts may be filed in the county of the events, the central administrative office, the claimant's residence, or the defendant's residence.
Frequently Asked Questions
What penalties do state entities and school districts face for violating DEI or curriculum laws?
Who is authorized to file a lawsuit against a school district for curriculum violations?
What happens to the professional license of a terminated employee?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
2 actions- Jan 27, 2026SenateSubcommittee: Salmon, Green, and Quirmbach. S.J. 148 .
- Jan 21, 2026SenateIntroducedIntroduced, referred to Education. S.J. 120 .
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Introduction of Mandatory License Revocations for Terminated Personnel
The bill creates explicit cross-references across multiple Iowa Code sections requiring professional licensing boards and the supreme court to revoke licenses for individuals terminated under DEI or curriculum violations.
Connected Entities
Sources
www.legis.iowa.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance75How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy90Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz65Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools