POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Enacted

Idaho Requires Ignition Interlock Devices for DUI Offenders Starting July 2026

Original title: IGNITION INTERLOCK SYSTEMS – Amends existing law to establish provisions regarding ignition interlock systems.

Last action · March 26, 2026: Signed by Governor on 03/26/26 Session Law Chapter 134 Effective: 07/01/2026

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Does

Idaho courts must order individuals convicted of driving under the influence who receive suspended sentences to install state-approved s with a calibration setting of .025 on all vehicles they operate, effective July 1, 2026. The offender pays for the installation and maintenance, unless eligible for financial hardship assistance from the court interlock device and electronic monitoring device fund.

Why it matters

Convicted DUI offenders face mandatory out-of-pocket costs for ignition interlock installation and a one-year restriction period noted on their driver's licenses, while vendors must report failed start attempts to prosecutors.

Background
  • Ignition interlock systems are breath-alcohol monitoring devices installed in motor vehicles to prevent individuals from operating them after consuming alcohol. context
  • Idaho's Legislature considers statutory updates regarding driving under the influence penalties during its regular annual sessions. context

Who It Affects

Groups the bill's text affects, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

persons convicted of driving under the influence

Offenders with suspended sentences must install ignition interlock systems on all operated vehicles at their own expense, maintain a one-year restriction on their driver's licenses, and face prevented vehicle starts at a .025 calibration setting.

Directly affected

ignition interlock vendors

Vendors must include cameras on certified breath alcohol devices, provide proof of installation to the transportation department, and notify prosecuting authorities whenever a user is prevented from starting a vehicle.

Directly affected

transportation department

The department must establish certification, installation, repair, and removal standards by rule, receive proof of installation, and imprint restricted driving documents with ignition interlock notations.

Directly affected

prosecuting authority

Prosecutors receive notifications from ignition interlock vendors whenever an individual is prevented from starting a motor vehicle.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who pays for the ignition interlock system?
The offender is required to pay the cost of obtaining, installing, utilizing, and maintaining the , though offenders experiencing financial hardship may be eligible to utilize available funds from the court interlock device and electronic monitoring device fund.
What blood alcohol concentration triggers the ignition interlock system to prevent a vehicle from starting?
The system is calibrated to prevent the motor vehicle from starting at a setting of .025.
How long does the ignition interlock restriction last?
The restriction period ends one year from the date the ignition interlock vendor provides proof of installation to the transportation department.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Current status: Signed into law.

Procedural history

16 actions
  1. Mar 26, 2026Enrolled
    Signed by Governor on 03/26/26 Session Law Chapter 134 Effective: 07/01/2026
  2. Mar 26, 2026
    Reported delivered to Governor at 4:33 p.m. on 03/25/26
  3. Mar 25, 2026
    Reported signed by the Speaker & ordered delivered to Governor
  4. Mar 25, 2026
    Received from Senate; Signed by Speaker; Returned to Senate
  5. Mar 24, 2026
    Reported enrolled; signed by President; to House for signature of Speaker
  6. Mar 24, 2026Committee
    Returned From House Passed; referred to enrolling
Show 10 earlier actions
  1. Mar 23, 2026Floor
    Read Third Time in Full – PASSED - 40-28-2 AYES – Alfieri, Bingham, Boyle, Church, Crane(12), Crane(13), Egbert, Erickson, Fuhriman, Galaviz, Gannon, Green, Hall(Stone), Handy, Haws, Healey, Hill, Holtzclaw, Manwaring, Mathias, McCann, Mickelsen, Miller, Nelsen, Palmer, Petzke, Pickett, Pohanka, Raybould, Raymond, Redman, Rubel, Sauter, Shirts, Skaug, Vander Woude, Veile, Weber, Wheeler, Mr. Speaker NAYS – Barbieri, Beiswenger, Bruce, Burgoyne, Cannon, Cayler, Cheatum, Dygert, Ehardt, Ehlers, Furniss, Garner, Harris, Hawkins, Hostetler, Leavitt, Marmon, Mendive, Mitchell, Monks, Price, Rasor, Scott, Shepherd, Tanner(13), Tanner(14), Thompson, Wisniewski Absent – Berch, Cornilles Floor Sponsor - Hill Title apvd - to Senate
  2. Mar 20, 2026
    Read second time; Filed for Third Reading
  3. Mar 19, 2026
    Reported out of Committee with Do Pass Recommendation, Filed for Second Reading
  4. Mar 3, 2026Introduced
    Read First Time, Referred to Judiciary, Rules & Administration
  5. Mar 3, 2026
    Received from the Senate, Filed for First Reading
  6. Mar 2, 2026Floor
    Read third time in full – PASSED - 21-14-0 AYES – Anthon, Bernt, Bruner(Adams), Burtenshaw, Cook, Den Hartog, Foreman, Galloway, Grow, Keyser, Lakey, Lent, Rabe, Ricks, Ruchti, Semmelroth, Taylor, VanOrden, Ward-Engelking, Wintrow, Woodward NAYS – Bjerke(Bjerke), Blaylock, Carlson, Guthrie, Harris, Hart, Kohl, Lenney, Nichols, Okuniewicz, Shippy, Toews, Zito, Zuiderveld Absent and excused – None Floor Sponsor - Foreman Title apvd - to House
  7. Feb 25, 2026
    Read second time; filed for Third Reading
  8. Feb 24, 2026
    Reported out of Committee with Do Pass Recommendation; Filed for second reading
  9. Feb 17, 2026Committee
    Reported Printed; referred to Judiciary & Rules
  10. Feb 16, 2026Introduced
    Introduced; read first time; referred to JR for Printing

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Stricter Calibration and Reporting Standards for DUI Sentences

The law standardizes the ignition interlock trigger at .025 and mandates direct vendor reporting of failed starts to prosecutors alongside a one-year restriction period.

Connected Entities

JUDICIARY AND RULES COMMITTEE, transportation department
OrganizationJUDICIARY AND RULES COMMITTEE“Senate committee sponsoring Senate Bill 1311”Map →
Organizationtransportation department“State agency responsible for certifying ignition interlock devices, setting rule”Map →

Sources

Open source document

legislature.idaho.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record