POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCourts →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Passed

North Carolina House Bill 771 authorizes witness depositions in criminal cases, establishes sexual assault victim rights, and modifies District Attorneys Conference

Original title: Criminal Law Procedures.

Last action · April 30, 2025: Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate (Senate action)Sponsors: Stevens and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Would Do

North Carolina House Bill 771 allows the State to request court-ordered s of material witnesses in criminal cases under specific circumstances, establishes new statutory rights for sexual assault victims regarding evidence kits, and amends operations for the Conference of District Attorneys. The deposition and sexual assault provisions take effect December 1, 2025, while the District Attorneys Conference modifications take effect July 1, 2025.

Why it matters

The measure alters criminal trial discovery by enabling pretrial witness s for the prosecution, grants sexual assault survivors specific tracking and preservation rights for forensic kits, and changes internal governance rules for district attorneys.

Background
  • The North Carolina General Assembly considers public bills proposing updates to state statutes governing criminal law procedure and district attorney operations during its legislative session. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

criminal defendants

Defendants are subject to state-requested depositions, are entitled to notice and presence at examinations, and gain the right to counsel for depositions.

Directly affected

victims of sexual assault

Victims gain statutory rights to track evidence kit testing status and location, receive disposal warnings, and have support advocates present in court.

Directly affected

Office of the Attorney General

The office is required to prepare, publish, and distribute a plain-language list of rights for victims of sexual assault.

Directly affected

Conference of District Attorneys

The organization experiences modified meeting notice timelines, election rules, and executive director licensing mandates.

Key Facts

  • The State may move the court to take a deposition of a prospective material witness in criminal proceedings under specific statutory criteria such as imminent danger, severe illness, or age 65 or older.
  • A motion to take a deposition by the State requires at least 10 days' notice to the defendant and must be heard by the court having jurisdiction over the most serious charge.
  • Audiovisual recordings of depositions may be required by any party, but remain confidential from public inspection until admitted into evidence at a trial or hearing.
  • Persons for whom a sexual assault evidence collection kit has been completed gain the right to request testing status, location information, advance notice of destruction, and further preservation.
Show all 8 facts
  • The Office of the Attorney General must prepare, publish on its website, and distribute to hospitals a plain-language list of sexual assault victims' rights by December 1, 2025.
  • Notice requirements for calling meetings of the Conference of District Attorneys are reduced from 10 days to five days.
  • The Executive Director of the Conference of District Attorneys must be an attorney licensed and eligible to practice in North Carolina courts at appointment and throughout service.
  • The deposition and sexual assault kit provisions apply to offenses committed and kits in possession on or after December 1, 2025.

Frequently Asked Questions

Under what conditions can the State take a deposition of a witness before trial?
The State may request a if the witness is in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm, has been threatened due to their status, is about to leave the State, is sick or infirm, is detained as a material witness and likely to flee, or is 65 years of age or older.
What rights do sexual assault victims have regarding their evidence collection kits under this bill?
Victims have the right to request the testing status and location of their kit, receive written notice at least 60 days before any intended destruction or disposal, request further preservation of the kit, and have an advocate or support person present during court proceedings.
When do the new deposition and victim rights provisions go into effect?
The provisions become effective on December 1, 2025, and apply to offenses committed and kits in possession on or after that date.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently passed chamber. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Law.

Procedural history

14 actions
  1. Apr 30, 2025Senate
    Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate
  2. Apr 30, 2025Senate
    Passed 1st Reading
  3. Apr 30, 2025Senate
    Regular Message Received From House
  4. Apr 30, 2025House
    Regular Message Sent To Senate
  5. Apr 29, 2025House
    Passed 3rd Reading
  6. Apr 29, 2025House
    Passed 2nd Reading
Show 8 earlier actions
  1. Apr 28, 2025House
    Placed On Cal For 04/29/2025
  2. Apr 28, 2025House
    Cal Pursuant Rule 36(b)
  3. Apr 28, 2025House
    Reptd Fav
  4. Apr 15, 2025House
    Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  5. Apr 15, 2025House
    Reptd Fav
  6. Apr 7, 2025House
    Ref to the Com on Judiciary 2, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
  7. Apr 7, 2025House
    Passed 1st Reading
  8. Apr 3, 2025HouseIntroduced
    Filed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Voting Record

Outcome not reportedHouse4/29/2025North Carolina LegislatureOfficial roll call ↗

Second Reading

Total

115

Yes
106
No
3
Present
0
Not voting
6
Abstain
0

How they voted (115)

91 more members
Sarah CrawfordParty not recordedyes
Kanika BrownParty not recordedabsent
Jeff ZengerParty not recordedyes
Jeff McNeelyParty not recordedyes
Matthew WinslowParty not recordedyes
Maria CervaniaParty not recordedyes
Howard PennyParty not recordedyes
Hugh BlackwellParty not recordedyes
Stephen RossParty not recordedabsent
Phil RubinParty not recordedyes
Deb ButlerParty not recordedabsent
Heather RhyneParty not recordedyes
John BellParty not recordedyes
Amber BakerParty not recordedyes
Charles SmithParty not recordedyes
Eric AgerParty not recordedyes
Robert ReivesParty not recordedabsent
William BrissonParty not recordedyes
Zack HawkinsParty not recordedyes
Karl GillespieParty not recordedyes
Keith KidwellParty not recordedyes
Cynthia BallParty not recordedyes
Donnie LoftisParty not recordedyes
Shelly WillinghamParty not recordedyes
Ray JeffersParty not recordedabsent
Lindsey PratherParty not recordedyes
von HaefenParty not recordedyes
Donny LambethParty not recordedyes
Carson SmithParty not recordedyes
Beth Gardner HelfrichParty not recordedyes
Tracy ClarkParty not recordedyes
Ya LiuParty not recordedyes
Jennifer BalkcomParty not recordedyes
Kyle HallParty not recordedyes
Diane WheatleyParty not recordedyes
Brenden JonesParty not recordedyes
Bill WardParty not recordedyes
Celeste CairnsParty not recordedyes
Carla CunninghamParty not recordedyes
Ray PickettParty not recordedyes
John SaulsParty not recordedyes
Terry BrownParty not recordedyes
Aisha DewParty not recordedyes
Mike ColvinParty not recordedyes
Mitchell SetzerParty not recordedyes
Mark PlessParty not recordedyes
Reece PyrtleParty not recordedyes
Jay AdamsParty not recordedyes
Mary BelkParty not recordedno
Renée PriceParty not recordedyes
Joe PikeParty not recordedyes
Phil ShepardParty not recordedyes
Vernetta AlstonParty not recordedyes
Julia HowardParty not recordedyes
Dennis RiddellParty not recordedyes
Ed GoodwinParty not recordedyes
Bryan CohnParty not recordedyes
Blair EddinsParty not recordedyes
Frank IlerParty not recordedyes
Brian TurnerParty not recordedyes
David WillisParty not recordedyes
Brandon LoftonParty not recordedyes
Monika Johnson-HostlerParty not recordedyes
Laura BuddParty not recordedyes
Dante PittmanParty not recordedyes
Tricia CothamParty not recordedyes
Abe JonesParty not recordedyes
Mike SchietzeltParty not recordedyes
Brian EchevarriaParty not recordedyes
Erin ParéParty not recordedyes
Harry WarrenParty not recordedyes
Jimmy DixonParty not recordedyes
Carolyn LoganParty not recordedyes
Frances JacksonParty not recordedyes
Todd CarverParty not recordedyes
Neal JacksonParty not recordedyes
John TorbettParty not recordedyes
Dean ArpParty not recordedyes
John BlustParty not recordedyes
James RobersonParty not recordedyes
Kelly HastingsParty not recordedyes
Allen BuansiParty not recordedyes
Wyatt GableParty not recordedabsent
Nasif MajeedParty not recordedyes
Alan BransonParty not recordedyes
Dudley GreeneParty not recordedyes
Pricey HarrisonParty not recordedno
Marcia MoreyParty not recordedno
Garland PierceParty not recordedyes
Cody HuneycuttParty not recordedyes
Tim LongestParty not recordedyes

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of Prosecution Deposition Powers

The legislation establishes formal statutory mechanisms for the State to depose material witnesses in criminal cases under defined exceptional circumstances.

Connected Entities

Office of the Attorney General, Pricey Harrison, Conference of District Attorneys and 4 more
OrganizationOffice of the Attorney General“Required to prepare and publish a list of rights for victims of sexual assault”Map →
PersonPricey Harrison“Cosponsor of House Bill 771”Map →
OrganizationConference of District Attorneys“Subject to operational modifications regarding meetings, notices, and executive ”Map →
PersonJulia Greenfield“Cosponsor of House Bill 771”Map →
PersonStevens“Primary sponsor of House Bill 771”Map →
OrganizationDepartment of Public Safety“Possessor of sexual assault evidence collection kits affected by the new provisi”Map →
PersonCharles Smith“Cosponsor of House Bill 771”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance75
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy45
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record