POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah HB 413 Requires Electric Utilities to Analyze Surplus Interconnection Service

Original title: Surplus Interconnection Service Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: House/ filedSponsor: Christine Watkins

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

This bill requires affected electrical utilities in Utah to analyze opportunities in their filings and allows them to recover approved project costs starting May 6, 2026.

Why it matters

The measure establishes new planning requirements for electrical utilities regarding unused transmission capacity, affecting how utilities evaluate and recover costs for energy projects.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

affected electrical utility

Affected electrical utilities must analyze surplus interconnection service opportunities in integrated resource plan filings, consider them in action plans, and are permitted to recover approved project costs.

Directly affected

generators

Generators holding large generator interconnection agreements are subject to analysis for potential surplus interconnection service opportunities.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is surplus interconnection service under this bill?
It is any unneeded portion of interconnection service established in a , such that utilizing it keeps the interconnection service limit at the point of interconnection the same.
Can utilities recover costs for surplus interconnection service projects?
Yes, if the Public Service Commission determines based on the utility's analysis and action plan that the deployment of is cost-effective.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

15 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026House
    House/ strike enacting clause
  3. Mar 5, 2026House
    House/ comm rpt/ sent to Rules
  4. Mar 2, 2026House
    House Comm - Recommends Returned to Rules
  5. Feb 12, 2026House
    House Comm - Held
  6. Feb 10, 2026HouseCommittee
    House/ to standing committee
Show 9 earlier actions
  1. Feb 3, 2026House
    House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  2. Feb 2, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0413
  3. Jan 30, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0413
  4. Jan 29, 2026HouseIntroduced
    House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  5. Jan 29, 2026House
    House/ received bill from Legislative Research
  6. Jan 28, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0413
  7. Jan 28, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0413
  8. Jan 28, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  9. Jan 28, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Energy Resource Procurement Act, Christine F. Watkins, Public Service Commission
otherEnergy Resource Procurement Act“Act amended by this bill”Map →
PersonChristine F. Watkins“Chief Sponsor of HB 413”Map →
OrganizationPublic Service Commission“Commission that encourages inclusion of surplus interconnection service and appr”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 40)
  • Controversy10
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz15
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record