POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia Bill Requires Manufacturers to Repair or Replace Defective Manufactured Homes

Original title: Relating to consumer protection of new manufactured home warranties

Last action · February 5, 2026: To House JudiciarySponsor: Mike Pushkin

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

House Bill 5255 establishes legal duties for manufactured home manufacturers to repair, replace, or refund defective new manufactured homes when express warranties are not met. The measure requires manufacturers to bear all compliance costs, prohibits shifting warranty expenses onto dealers, and provides consumers with civil remedies and mandatory pre-dispute resolution options.

Why it matters

Purchasers of new manufactured homes gain specific statutory enforcement mechanisms to compel manufacturers to fix major structural or mechanical defects or issue full purchase price refunds, altering how warranty disputes are resolved in the state.

Background
  • Manufactured homes are regulated differently from site-built housing under federal and state standards, often relying on express manufacturer warranties rather than traditional builder guarantees. context
  • State-level lemon laws for motor vehicles and manufactured housing generally establish specific repair attempts and statutory timeframes before allowing consumers to seek court remedies or replacements. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Manufacturers

Manufacturers are assigned direct statutory duties to repair, replace, or refund defective homes, bear all compliance costs, and comply with third-party dispute resolution rules.

Directly affected

Consumers

Consumers receive new statutory remedies, including the right to civil action, warranty enforcement protections, written disclosures for returned homes, and access to dispute resolution.

Directly affected

Dealers

Authorized dealers are prohibited from absorbing manufacturer warranty costs, must disclose certain retail repairs exceeding five percent of the suggested retail price, and are protected from manufacturer liability claims in the absence of improper repair work.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if a new manufactured home has a dangerous defect?
If a defect is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury, it is presumed that a reasonable number of repair attempts have been undertaken after just one unsuccessful repair by the manufacturer.
Can a manufacturer shift repair costs onto a local dealer?
No. Any agreement that transfers warranty duties or costs to a dealer, or reduces dealer reimbursement for performing warranty work, is void and unenforceable.
Must a consumer go to court immediately over a warranty dispute?
Not necessarily. If a qualified third-party dispute resolution process exists and the consumer received timely written notice of it, the consumer must initially resort to that process before asserting a civil cause of action.
What disclosures are required when selling a previously returned manufactured home?
The manufacturer must correct the and provide the buyer with a written statement on a separate piece of paper in 10-point all capital type stating that the home was returned because it did not conform to the warranty.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 5, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Judiciary
  2. Feb 5, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House
  3. Feb 5, 2026HouseCommittee
    To Judiciary
  4. Feb 5, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Shift of Warranty Costs to Manufacturers

The bill explicitly invalidates any contractual provisions that shift manufacturer warranty compliance costs or performance duties onto local dealers.

Connected Entities

Mike Pushkin, Division of Consumer Protection, Attorney General and 1 more
PersonMike Pushkin“Delegate who introduced House Bill 5255”Map →
OrganizationDivision of Consumer Protection“Supervises third-party dispute resolution mechanisms”Map →
OrganizationAttorney General“Responsible for promulgating rules for third-party dispute resolution mechanisms”Map →
OrganizationHouse Judiciary“Committee to which the bill was referred”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record