POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kansas bill establishes student secular bill of rights to prohibit religious coercion in public schools

Original title: AN ACT concerning education; enacting the student secular bill of rights; establishing statutory protections against religious coercion and discrimination in pubic schools; providing a cause of action for students and parents for violations thereof.

Last action · April 10, 2026: Died in CommitteeSponsors: Heather Meyer and 2 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

This bill establishes statutory protections for public school students against religious coercion and discrimination, granting students the right to practice or abstain from religion, and creating a formal grievance procedure and legal cause of action for violations. School districts must adopt implementation policies by January 1, 2027, following guidance developed by the state board of education by October 1, 2026.

Why it matters

Public school students and parents gain explicit legal rights to challenge school-sponsored religious activities, displays, or , and can sue school districts for damages or injunctive relief within a two-year window.

Background
  • The First Amendment of the United States Constitution establishes the separation of church and state, which has been interpreted by the Supreme Court in landmark cases such as Everson v. Board of Education and Engel v. Vitale. context
  • HB 2431 was introduced during the 2025-2026 legislative session in Kansas and ultimately died in committee. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Public school students

Students gain explicit statutory rights to be free from school-sponsored religious activities and gain access to a formal grievance process and legal remedies.

Directly affected

Parents

Parents gain the right to file formal grievances and bring civil lawsuits in court for violations of their child's statutory religious protections.

Directly affected

School districts

School districts are required to adopt formal grievance procedures, implement state board guidance, provide employee training, and face potential civil lawsuits and legal liability for violations.

Directly affected

School district employees

Employees are prohibited from leading prayer, providing religious instruction, or offering incentives for religious participation, and receive whistleblower protections for reporting violations.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What rights do public school students have under this bill?
Students have the right to practice any or no religion, be free from religious discrimination, and be free from school-sponsored religious teachings, prayers, displays, and messaging on school property or at school events.
Can students still express their religious beliefs in school assignments?
Yes. The bill expressly permits student-created religious expression in individual assignments or projects, provided the work addresses the learning objectives required by the curriculum.
What legal recourse do students and parents have if a violation occurs?
Students and parents can report violations through a formal school district grievance procedure or bring a civil cause of action in a court of competent jurisdiction within two years to seek damages, an injunction, or attorney fees.
When must school districts adopt policies to comply with the act?
Board of education school districts must adopt implementation policies and procedures, including required employee training, on or before January 1, 2027.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died in committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Apr 10, 2026House
    Died in Committee
  2. Jan 12, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Prefiled for Introduction on Friday, January 9, 2026
  3. Jan 12, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced
  4. Jan 12, 2026HouseCommittee
    Referred to House Committee on Education

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Establishment of State-Level Statutory Protections

The bill codifies federal Establishment Clause jurisprudence into explicit state statutory rights with an independent private right of action for public school students and parents.

Connected Entities

James Madison, Supreme Court of the United States, Heather Meyer and 5 more
PersonJames Madison“Cited as primary author of the First Amendment”Map →
OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States“Cited in legislative findings regarding Establishment Clause jurisprudence”Map →
PersonHeather Meyer“Primary sponsor of HB 2431”Map →
PersonThomas Jefferson“Cited as original supporter of the First Amendment”Map →
PersonRonald Reagan“Cited regarding the separation of church and state”Map →
OrganizationState Board of Education“Tasked with developing guidance and model policies by October 1, 2026”Map →
PersonMelissa Oropeza“Co-sponsor of HB 2431”Map →
PersonRepresentative Ruiz“Co-sponsor of HB 2431”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.kslegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 75)
  • Controversy90
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment15
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz40
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record