POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Rhode Island Bill Adds School Employees to Protections Against Threats to Public Officials

Original title: AN ACT RELATING TO CRIMINAL OFFENSES -- THREATS AND EXTORTION (Adds school superintendents, central office officials, school principals, and all other school employees, to the definition of a “public official” for purposes of the criminal prohibition against making threats to public officials.)

Last action · April 2, 2026: Committee recommended measure be held for further studySponsors: David Tikoian and 9 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Senate Bill 2957 expands the definition of a under Rhode Island criminal law to include school superintendents, central office officials, principals, and all other school employees, applying criminal threat prohibitions to them.

Why it matters

Expands legal protections against threats to cover public school personnel, meaning individuals who threaten these employees face the same criminal penalties previously reserved for threats against traditional s.

Background
  • State criminal codes typically designate specific categories of government workers as public officials to apply harsher penalties for threats, harassment, or extortion. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

School employees

School superintendents, central office officials, principals, and all other school employees are included in the definition of public officials, extending criminal threat protections to them.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is newly covered under the threat and extortion laws in this bill?
School superintendents, central office officials, school principals, and all other school employees are added to the definition of a .
What is the current status of Senate Bill 2957?
The measure was introduced on March 4, 2026, and a Senate committee recommended that it be held for further study.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in Senate committee.

Procedural history

3 actions
  1. Apr 2, 2026
    Committee recommended measure be held for further study
  2. Mar 27, 2026
    Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (04/02/2026)
  3. Mar 4, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, referred to Senate Judiciary

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Stefano Famiglietti, Ciccone, Andrew Dimitri and 7 more
PersonStefano Famiglietti“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2957”Map →
PersonCiccone“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2957”Map →
PersonAndrew Dimitri“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2957”Map →
PersonMark McKenney“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2957”Map →
PersonMatt LaMountain“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2957”Map →
PersonBrian Thompson“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2957”Map →
PersonTodd Patalano“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2957”Map →
PersonGallo“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2957”Map →
PersonJohn Burke“Cosponsor of Senate Bill 2957”Map →
PersonDavid Tikoian“Primary sponsor of Senate Bill 2957”Map →

Sources

Open source document

status.rilegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 45)
  • Controversy30
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record