POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

West Virginia House Bill 5495 requires statewide digital privacy agreements and academic verification for all public school software

Original title: Creating certain requirements and accountability procedures regarding a student’s use of software in a public school.

Last action · February 13, 2026: To House EducationSponsors: Jeff Stephens and 7 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

West Virginia public schools and the State Board of Education must execute a statewide digital privacy agreement and verify academic effectiveness for all educational software by July 1, 2026. The legislation prohibits s, restricts biometric and emotional data collection, and requires county boards to notify parents annually of all software in use.

Background
  • House Bill 5495 was introduced during the 2026 Regular Session of the West Virginia Legislature and was referred to the House Committee on Education. context
  • State digital privacy legislation regarding educational technology has increasingly focused on restricting addictive design features and biometric data collection in K-12 public schools. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

County Boards of Education

County boards must execute statewide digital privacy agreements, verify software effectiveness, publish annual software lists for parents, and submit to triennial compliance audits.

Directly affected

Software Vendors

Vendors must sign the statewide digital privacy agreement, provide independent proof of academic effectiveness, and adhere to strict restrictions on data collection and app features.

Directly affected

Public School Students

Students receive heightened privacy protections, limitations on behavioral tracking and addictive app features, and access exclusively to academically effective software.

Directly affected

Parents and Guardians

Parents gain the right to receive annual disclosures of classroom software, get advance notice of new app adoptions, and submit formal complaints regarding privacy violations.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the bill require software vendors to do before schools can use their products?
Vendors must execute the statewide digital privacy agreement and secure independent verification proving that their software is .
Are parents notified about the software used in classrooms?
Yes, county boards of education must provide parents with an annual public list of all instructional software, update the list within 10 business days of changes, and give written notice before new software is used.
What types of software design features are banned?
The bill prohibits s such as infinite scroll or autoplay past educational tasks, gamification rewards tied to time spent rather than learning, and persistent notifications prompting re-engagement.
How can parents report non-compliant software?
Parents can submit a written complaint to the State Board alleging the use of unverified software or privacy violations, which the board reviews alongside the Attorney General.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

4 actions
  1. Feb 13, 2026HouseCommittee
    To House Education
  2. Feb 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Introduced in House
  3. Feb 13, 2026HouseCommittee
    To Education
  4. Feb 13, 2026HouseIntroduced
    Filed for introduction

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Shift from Local to Centralized Digital Oversight

The legislation shifts oversight authority by mandating a single statewide digital privacy agreement created by the State Board and requiring independent verification of academic effectiveness for all classroom software.

Connected Entities

Dana Ferrell, Jeff Stephens, Guy Ward and 7 more
PersonDana Ferrell“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5495”Map →
PersonJeff Stephens“Lead sponsor of House Bill 5495”Map →
PersonGuy Ward“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5495”Map →
PersonBill Bell“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5495”Map →
PersonKathie Hess Crouse“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5495”Map →
OrganizationOffice of the Attorney General“Consults with the State Board to review complaints and take enforcement action”Map →
OrganizationState Board“Creates the statewide digital privacy agreement and maintains software master li”Map →
PersonSarah Drennan“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5495”Map →
PersonPritt“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5495”Map →
PersonLori Dittman“Co-sponsor of House Bill 5495”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.wvlegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz45
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record