POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Kentucky HB 437 repeals the one-week waiting period for unemployment benefits and modifies work search verification rules

Original title: AN ACT relating to unemployment benefits.

Last action · January 28, 2026: to Economic Development & Workforce Investment (H)Sponsors: Felicia Rabourn and 5 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Kentucky HB 437 removes the requirement that unemployed workers serve a one-week waiting period before collecting benefits. The measure also eliminates weekly audit reporting mandates for the cabinet and amends definitions relating to s for workers' compensation recipients.

Why it matters

Unemployed claimants can begin receiving payments one week earlier than under current law, altering the timing of initial financial assistance for workers statewide.

Background
  • Kentucky HB 437 was introduced in the 2026 regular session and assigned to the House Economic Development & Workforce Investment committee. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

unemployed workers

Claimants can receive benefit payments immediately without serving an initial unpaid waiting week.

Directly affected

employers

Employers or insurance carriers must provide written notice and eligibility verification to workers before workers' compensation benefits expire.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does HB 437 still require claimants to search for work?
Yes. Claimants must still engage in at least five verifiable work search activities each week, including at least three formal job applications or interviews.
What changes regarding the waiting period for benefits?
The bill completely removes the requirement for a one-week waiting period at the start of an initial unemployment claim.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

2 actions
  1. Jan 28, 2026HouseCommittee
    to Economic Development & Workforce Investment (H)
  2. Jan 20, 2026HouseIntroduced
    introduced in House to Committee on Committees (H)

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Felicia Rabourn, General Assembly, Candy Massaroni and 6 more
PersonFelicia Rabourn“Primary sponsor of HB 437”Map →
OrganizationGeneral Assembly“Enacting body of the Commonwealth of Kentucky”Map →
PersonCandy Massaroni“Cosponsor of HB 437”Map →
OrganizationKentucky Career Center“Partner programs related to employment search”Map →
PersonAl Gentry“Cosponsor of HB 437”Map →
PersonNima Kulkarni“Cosponsor of HB 437”Map →
PersonBeverly Chester-Burton“Cosponsor of HB 437”Map →
PersonChad Aull“Cosponsor of HB 437”Map →
OrganizationInterim Joint Committee on Economic Development and Workforce Investment“Legislative committee referenced in audit reporting requirements”Map →

Sources

Open source document

apps.legislature.ky.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 65)
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record