New Rules for Drone Use and Surveillance
April 24, 2025
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
The Frame
The bill changes the legal consequences for drone operators and defines the rights of property owners to defend their privacy against aerial surveillance, while also expanding the circumstances under which law enforcement may use drones.
Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.
Drone operators
Operators face new criminal penalties for prohibited flights and restrictions on modifying drone identification technology.
Private property owners
Owners gain the legal authority to use reasonable force against drones conducting surveillance below 500 feet.
Law enforcement agencies
Agencies are granted specific exceptions to use drones for crowd monitoring and protecting elected officials.
Last recorded activity April 24, 2025.
Introduced.
Summary
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I shoot down a drone flying over my house?
What happens if I modify my drone to hide its ID?
Can police use drones to watch crowds?
Why It Matters
The bill changes the legal consequences for drone operators and defines the rights of property owners to defend their privacy against aerial surveillance, while also expanding the circumstances under which law enforcement may use drones.
News Coverage
Lobbying Activity
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
on behalf of DOORDASH, INC.
CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC.
on behalf of EPIRUS, INC.
APCO WORLDWIDE LLC
on behalf of VICTUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
ROSS TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES, LLC
on behalf of OBSERVATION WITHOUT LIMITS, LLC
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE
Voting Record
Favorable
Total
22
Yes
22
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
How they voted (22)
Danny Burgess
Republican · yes
Lori Berman
Democratic · yes
Ileana Garcia
Republican · yes
Don Gaetz
Republican · yes
Jay Trumbull
Republican · yes
Ana Maria Rodriguez
Republican · yes
Corey Simon
Republican · yes
Rosalind Osgood
Democratic · yes
Colleen Burton
Republican · yes
Blaise Ingoglia
- · yes
Tracie Davis
Democratic · yes
Darryl Rouson
Democratic · yes
Ed Hooper
Republican · yes
Jason Pizzo
Independent · yes
Jason Brodeur
Republican · yes
Nick DiCeglie
Republican · yes
Gayle Harrell
Republican · yes
Jonathan Martin
Republican · yes
Tommy Wright
Republican · yes
Kathleen Passidomo
Republican · yes
Jim Boyd
Republican · yes
Jennifer Bradley
Republican · yes
Favorable with Committee Substitute
Total
8
Yes
8
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
Favorable with Committee Substitute
Total
9
Yes
9
No
0
Present
0
Not Voting
0
Abstain
0
Sponsors
Discoveries
Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.
Expansion of Law Enforcement Drone Use
The bill explicitly codifies exceptions for law enforcement to use drones for crowd monitoring and official security, moving beyond general surveillance restrictions.
Connected Entities
Sources
openstates.org
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance85How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy60Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment20Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz40Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools