POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Rhode Island Bill Expands Health Insurance Coverage Mandates for Fertility Care and Ovulation Drugs

Original title: AN ACT RELATING TO INSURANCE -- ACCIDENT AND SICKNESS INSURANCE POLICIES (Amends the current law on health insurance coverage for fertility diagnostic care, standard fertility preservation services, and fertility treatment and requires coverage for any medically necessary ovulation-enhancing drugs and medical services.)

Last action · March 3, 2026: Committee recommended measure be held for further studySponsors: Karen Alzate and 9 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Proposed

Rhode Island legislation expands existing health insurance mandates to require coverage for medically necessary and related medical services, alongside existing provisions for , standard , and fertility treatment.

Why it matters

Enrollees seeking fertility treatments or reproductive care face direct changes in out-of-pocket costs and insurance benefits as insurers are required to cover specific additional medications and services.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

health insurance enrollees

Health insurance enrollees gain mandated coverage access for medically necessary ovulation-enhancing drugs and related medical services.

Directly affected

health insurance carriers

Health insurance carriers must update their policy coverages to include medically necessary ovulation-enhancing drugs and associated services.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What new medical items are added to insurance coverage requirements?
The bill requires health insurance policies to cover any medically necessary and associated medical services.
Does the bill affect existing fertility care mandates?
Yes, it amends current law on health insurance coverage for , standard , and fertility treatment while adding new mandates for .

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · in House committee.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Mar 3, 2026
    Committee recommended measure be held for further study
  2. Feb 27, 2026
    Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration (03/03/2026)
  3. Feb 23, 2026
    Meeting postponed (02/24/2026)
  4. Feb 19, 2026
    Scheduled for hearing and/or consideration
  5. Feb 11, 2026Introduced
    Introduced, referred to House Health & Human Services

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

Messier, Katie Kazarian, David Bennett and 7 more
PersonMessier“Cosponsor of the legislation”Map →
PersonKatie Kazarian“Cosponsor of the legislation”Map →
PersonDavid Bennett“Cosponsor of the legislation”Map →
PersonRebecca Kislak“Cosponsor of the legislation”Map →
PersonKathleen Fogarty“Cosponsor of the legislation”Map →
PersonJenni Furtado“Cosponsor of the legislation”Map →
PersonKaren Alzate“Primary sponsor of House Bill 7629”Map →
PersonLeo Felix“Cosponsor of the legislation”Map →
PersonCarol McEntee“Cosponsor of the legislation”Map →
PersonJay Edwards“Cosponsor of the legislation”Map →

Sources

Open source document

status.rilegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 50)
  • Controversy35
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record