POLISCOPE
Back to bills
Part ofCrimes →

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

Utah SB 99 makes repeat non-emergency 911 calls a class B misdemeanor and requires full response cost reimbursement

Original title: Emergency Reporting Offense Amendments

Last action · March 6, 2026: Senate/ filedSponsors: Lincoln Fillmore and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

Official description

This bill modifies the offense of emergency reporting abuse.

Why it matters

Callers convicted of emergency reporting offenses face mandatory court-ordered reimbursement to governments or private entities for all expenses incurred during the response, altering financial liabilities for false or non-emergency reporting.

Background
  • Utah SB 99 was introduced during the 2026 General Session by Senator Lincoln Fillmore. context
  • State legislatures periodically update criminal statutes governing emergency services misuse to manage dispatch resources and address repeat callers. context

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

911 emergency response services

Services gain legal protections against repeat non-emergency calls and are eligible for court-ordered expense reimbursement from convicted individuals.

Directly affected

Individuals contacting emergency services

Callers face class B misdemeanor charges and mandatory reimbursement costs if they repeatedly contact 911 for non-emergencies after receiving an official warning.

Key Facts

  • Expands emergency reporting abuse to include contacting 911 when the actor knows or reasonably should know no public safety emergency exists, provided they were previously warned by officials that the circumstance is not appropriate for 911.
  • Classifies the new non-emergency 911 contact offense as a class B misdemeanor.
  • Mandates that courts order anyone convicted of an emergency reporting offense to reimburse federal, state, or local governments, private businesses, or individuals for all expenses and losses incurred in responding to the violation.
  • Allows a court to order less than full reimbursement only if the court states on the record the reasons why full reimbursement is inappropriate.
Show all 6 facts
  • Maintains a second degree felony penalty for reporting emergencies involving a weapon of mass destruction or making specific false emergency reports.
  • Sets the effective date of the bill as May 6, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if someone calls 911 for a non-emergency after being warned?
An individual commits emergency reporting abuse (a ) if they contact 911 knowing no emergency exists after a dispatcher, law enforcement officer, or prosecutor previously informed them that the situation is not appropriate for 911.
Are offenders required to pay for the cost of emergency response?
Yes, courts must order convicted individuals to reimburse all expenses and losses incurred by responding government units, private businesses, or individuals, unless the court states on the record why full reimbursement is inappropriate.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · on the Senate floor.

Procedural history

23 actions
  1. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ filed
  2. Mar 6, 2026Senate
    Senate/ strike enacting clause
  3. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ filed
  4. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ strike enacting clause
  5. Feb 13, 2026Senate
    Senate/ 2nd reading
  6. Jan 29, 2026Senate
    Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
Show 17 earlier actions
  1. Jan 29, 2026Senate
    Senate/ comm rpt/ substituted
  2. Jan 27, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
  3. Jan 27, 2026Senate
    Senate Comm - Substitute Recommendation
  4. Jan 27, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0099S01
  5. Jan 27, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0099S01
  6. Jan 25, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0099S01
  7. Jan 25, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0099S01
  8. Jan 20, 2026SenateCommittee
    Senate/ to standing committee
  9. Jan 20, 2026SenateIntroduced
    Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
  10. Jan 19, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
  11. Jan 16, 2026Released
    LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0099
  12. Jan 16, 2026Version Sponsor
    LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0099
  13. Jan 12, 2026Senate
    Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
  14. Jan 7, 2026Legislative Fiscal Agency
    LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0099
  15. Jan 7, 2026Legislative Fiscal Analyst
    LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0099
  16. Jan 7, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
  17. Jan 7, 2026Legislative Research and General Counsel
    Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift95% confidence

Expansion of 911 Misuse Penalties

The legislation broadens emergency reporting abuse from strictly false reports to include knowing non-emergency contacts following an official warning.

Connected Entities

Utah
locationUtah“Jurisdiction where the bill applies”Map →

Sources

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 55)
  • Controversy25
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record