The civic record
Read. Follow. Verify.Massachusetts Legislature Asks Congress to Pass Constitutional Amendment Overturning Citizens United
Last action · June 1, 2026: Accompanied a study order, see H5466 (under House Rule 27)Sponsors: Carmine Gentile and 3 others
Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.
What This Bill Would Do
The Massachusetts General Court petitions the U.S. Congress to pass and submit to the states a constitutional amendment that would allow federal and state governments to regulate and limit political campaign contributions and expenditures, and to distinguish natural persons from corporations and other entities.
The measure places the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on record in support of altering federal election law and campaign spending limits, though it creates no new state-level mandates or appropriations.
- Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited under the First Amendment. context
- In 2018, Massachusetts voters approved Ballot Question 2, establishing a citizens commission to advance a constitutional amendment regarding corporate spending and political contributions. context
Who It Would Affect
Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.
Congress of the United States
Receives the formal memorialization from the Massachusetts legislature urging action on a constitutional amendment.
Juridical entities including corporations and unions
The proposed constitutional amendment would grant governments the authority to prohibit them from raising and spending money in campaigns and elections.
Key Facts
You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does House Resolution 3843 do?
Does this resolution change state or federal law immediately?
What else do you want to know?
News Coverage
Follow the record
Votes, people, money & the original sourceWhere This Stands
Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.
Procedural history
5 actions- Jun 1, 2026HouseAccompanied a study order, see H5466 (under House Rule 27)
- Nov 13, 2025JointHearing rescheduled to 11/13/2025 from 01:00 PM-03:50 PM in B-1 and Virtual<br> <span style="color: blue; font-style: italic;">Hearing updated to New End Time</span>
- Nov 3, 2025JointHearing scheduled for 11/13/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in B-1
- Feb 27, 2025SenateSenate concurred
- Feb 27, 2025HouseCommitteeReferred to the committee on Veterans and Federal Affairs
Version history
Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.
View official text →Lobbying Activity
No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.
Full breakdown
Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.
Sponsors
Connected Entities
Sources
malegislature.gov
Analysis Score
0–100- Significance35How much this matters to a regular citizen
- Controversy65Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
- Entertainment10Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
- Buzz25Current news / social attention level
Publisher tools
