POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Massachusetts Legislature Asks Congress to Pass Constitutional Amendment Overturning Citizens United

Original title: Resolutions for an application to Congress for an amendment overturning Citizens United

Last action · June 1, 2026: Accompanied a study order, see H5466 (under House Rule 27)Sponsors: Carmine Gentile and 3 others

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

The Massachusetts General Court petitions the U.S. Congress to pass and submit to the states a constitutional amendment that would allow federal and state governments to regulate and limit political campaign contributions and expenditures, and to distinguish natural persons from corporations and other entities.

Why it matters

The measure places the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on record in support of altering federal election law and campaign spending limits, though it creates no new state-level mandates or appropriations.

Background
  • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections cannot be limited under the First Amendment. context
  • In 2018, Massachusetts voters approved Ballot Question 2, establishing a citizens commission to advance a constitutional amendment regarding corporate spending and political contributions. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

Congress of the United States

Receives the formal memorialization from the Massachusetts legislature urging action on a constitutional amendment.

Directly affected

Juridical entities including corporations and unions

The proposed constitutional amendment would grant governments the authority to prohibit them from raising and spending money in campaigns and elections.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does House Resolution 3843 do?
It formally petitions the U.S. Congress to propose a constitutional amendment that would allow governments to regulate campaign spending and distinguish between human beings and corporations.
Does this resolution change state or federal law immediately?
No. As a resolution, it expresses the formal stance of the Massachusetts legislature but does not enact new laws or regulations.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

5 actions
  1. Jun 1, 2026House
    Accompanied a study order, see H5466 (under House Rule 27)
  2. Nov 13, 2025Joint
    Hearing rescheduled to 11/13/2025 from 01:00 PM-03:50 PM in B-1 and Virtual<br> <span style="color: blue; font-style: italic;">Hearing updated to New End Time</span>
  3. Nov 3, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 11/13/2025 from 01:00 PM-05:00 PM in B-1
  4. Feb 27, 2025Senate
    Senate concurred
  5. Feb 27, 2025HouseCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Veterans and Federal Affairs

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Connected Entities

United States Supreme Court, Federal Elections Commission, Congress of the United States and 1 more
OrganizationUnited States Supreme Court“Issued rulings affecting campaign finance and the first amendment.”Map →
OrganizationFederal Elections Commission“Party in the Citizens United v. the Federal Elections Commission ruling.”Map →
OrganizationCongress of the United States“Recipient of the memorializing resolution.”Map →
locationCommonwealth of Massachusetts“Jurisdiction petitioning Congress.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance35
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz25
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record