POLISCOPE
Back to feed
SB 1373CALIFORNIASession 20252026

California SB 1373 requires court hearings for pretrial mental health diversion if requested

Original title: Diversion.

August 13, 2026

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

The Frame

What this does

This bill changes the legal process for defendants seeking mental health treatment in lieu of prosecution by ensuring that prosecutors or defense attorneys can force a formal hearing before a judge makes a summary decision on diversion.

Who is mentioned in the record

Potentially affected actors named in the source documents. Mention is not a position.

local prosecutors

The bill increases their duties by requiring participation in additional hearings upon request.

defendants with mental disorders

Their access to pretrial diversion is now subject to a mandatory hearing process if requested by either party.

local agencies

They are eligible for state reimbursement for costs incurred due to the new hearing requirements.

What changed

Last recorded activity August 13, 2026.

What's next

Introduced.

Summary

California SB 1373 requires courts to hold a hearing if either party requests one before the court can grant pretrial mental health diversion or other relief. This change increases the procedural duties of local prosecutors and establishes a process for state reimbursement of these mandated local costs.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Why It Matters

This bill changes the legal process for defendants seeking mental health treatment in lieu of prosecution by ensuring that prosecutors or defense attorneys can force a formal hearing before a judge makes a summary decision on diversion.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is pretrial diversion?
It is a legal process that allows a defendant suffering from a mental disorder to undergo mental health treatment instead of facing standard criminal prosecution.
Does this bill change who is eligible for diversion?
No, the bill focuses on the procedural requirement for a hearing if a party requests one, rather than changing the underlying eligibility criteria for the diversion program itself.

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Lobbying Activity

CAPITOL COUNSEL LLC

on behalf of TEMPUS LABS, INC.

NATURAL RESOURCE RESULTS LLC

on behalf of SONOMA WATER

MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC

on behalf of THE UNITED COMPANY

DARA KHOSROWSHAHI

on behalf of UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND AFFILIATES

Senate LDAView filing →

GRAHAM C GRADY

on behalf of INTRINSIC SCHOOLS

Senate LDAView filing →

GRAHAM C GRADY

on behalf of INTRINSIC SCHOOLS

Senate LDAView filing →

Connected Entities

otherCalifornia ConstitutionEstablishes the requirement for the state to reimburse local agencies for state-Map →
organizationCommission on State MandatesResponsible for determining if the bill creates state-mandated costs requiring rMap →

Sources

Open source document

openstates.org

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance65
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy40
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment5
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz20
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record