POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.

Massachusetts repeals Section 32 of gun registration law from 2024 acts

Original title: An Act relative to registration of guns

Last action · December 4, 2025: Accompanied a study order, see S2798Sponsors: Peter Durant and 1 other

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

What This Bill Would Do

Massachusetts s Section 32 of chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024, eliminating the specific provisions previously established under that section.

Why it matters

Removes existing statutory language governing gun registration from the 2024 legislative acts, altering the legal framework for individuals and agencies subject to that provision.

Background
  • Peter J. Durant is a member of the Massachusetts General Court representing constituents in the upper house. context
  • The bill was referred to the Public Safety and Homeland Security committee upon introduction. context

Who It Would Affect

Groups the bill's text would affect if enacted, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

gun owners

Gun owners are subject to changes in statutory requirements regarding gun registration following the repeal of Section 32.

Directly affected

law enforcement agencies

Law enforcement agencies must adjust administrative procedures based on the removal of the repealed statutory provision.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Bill S.1672 do?
It s Section 32 of chapter 135 of the Acts of 2024.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

Currently in committee. The next step in the legislative lifecycle is Floor Vote.

Procedural history

7 actions
  1. Dec 4, 2025Senate
    Accompanied a study order, see S2798
  2. Oct 31, 2025Joint
    Hearing rescheduled to 10/31/2025 from 11:30 AM-05:00 PM in Gardner Auditorium and Virtual<br> <span style="color: blue; font-style: italic;">Hearing updated to New End Time</span>
  3. Oct 27, 2025Joint
    Hearing rescheduled to 10/31/2025 from 11:30 AM-05:00 PM in Gardner Auditorium and Virtual<br> <span style="color: blue; font-style: italic;">Hearing updated to include Virtual</span>
  4. Oct 22, 2025Joint
    Hearing rescheduled to 10/31/2025 from 11:30 AM-05:00 PM in Gardner Auditorium and Virtual<br> <span style="color: blue; font-style: italic;">Hearing updated to include Virtual</span>
  5. Oct 16, 2025Joint
    Hearing scheduled for 10/31/2025 from 11:30 AM-05:00 PM in Gardner Auditorium
  6. Feb 27, 2025House
    House concurred
Show 1 earlier action
  1. Feb 27, 2025SenateCommittee
    Referred to the committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

cross reference90% confidence

Accompanied Study Order

The bill was accompanied by a study order, reference S2798, as part of its legislative progress.

Connected Entities

Kelly Pease, Peter Durant
PersonKelly Pease“Cosponsor of the bill”Map →
PersonPeter Durant“Primary sponsor of the bill”Map →

Sources

Open source document

malegislature.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance40
    How much this matters to a regular citizen
  • Controversy60
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz30
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record