POLISCOPE
Back to bills

The civic record

Read. Follow. Verify.
Did Not Advance

New Mexico bill regulates generative AI, mandates synthetic content disclosures, and imposes penalties for deceptive media

Original title: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACCOUNTABILITY ACT

Last action · January 22, 2026: Not PrintedSponsor: Linda Serrato

Introduced
Committee
Floor Vote
Passed
Law

Track this bill to get notified when it advances a stage. One tap to stop, anytime.

Public stanceCommunity reactions are separate from the official record and reporting.

What This Bill Proposed

New Mexico House Bill 141 enacts the Artificial Intelligence Accountability Act, requiring covered AI providers and large online platforms to embed s and offer provenance detection tools, while establishing civil and criminal penalties for deceptive . The bill mandates capture device manufacturers to embed latent disclosures by default starting January 1, 2028, and increases prison sentences for noncapital felonies assisted by generative AI.

Why it matters

The measure establishes enforceable transparency standards for AI companies and creates new legal liabilities and $15,000 per-day civil penalties for disseminating deceptive synthetic media, while allowing individuals to sue for damages of $1,000 per view or actual damages.

Who It Would Have Affected

Groups the bill's text would have affected, as described in the record. Being affected is not a position for or against it.

Directly affected

covered providers

Covered providers must offer manifest disclosures, embed permanent latent disclosures, provide free provenance detection tools, and maintain strict contract requirements with third-party licensees.

Directly affected

large online platforms

Large online platforms must detect and append system provenance data, provide user interfaces for inspecting data and requesting takedowns, and respond to takedown requests within 72 hours.

Directly affected

capture device manufacturers

Capture device manufacturers must embed default latent disclosures in devices produced for sale on or after January 1, 2028, while providing users an opt-out option.

Directly affected

depicted persons

Depicted persons gain the right to request takedowns of deceptive synthetic content and may pursue private rights of action for statutory or actual damages.

Key Facts

You don't have to trust us. Each fact below is taken straight from the official document - click any one to see the exact passage, highlighted in the original.

Frequently Asked Questions

What qualifies as deceptive synthetic content under this bill?
Deceptive is synthetic content that realistically depicts conduct a person did not engage in, makes the depicted person identifiable, is disseminated without their consent, and would be believed authentic by a reasonable person.
What penalties do companies face for violating the Artificial Intelligence Accountability Act?
Violators are liable for a civil penalty of $15,000 per violation, with each day of noncompliance treated as a separate violation, in addition to reasonable attorney costs and fees for the attorney general.
Are satire and news reporting exempt from liability for deceptive synthetic content?
Yes, dissemination for satire, parody, criticism, commentary, teaching, scholarship, research, education, or news reporting where a reasonable person would not believe the content accurately represents the depicted person's speech or conduct is exempt.

What else do you want to know?

News Coverage

No news coverage found yet. Articles are indexed twice daily.

Where This Stands

This bill did not become law - Died at adjournment · introduced in the House.

Procedural history

1 action
  1. Jan 22, 2026New Mexico Legislature
    Not Printed

Version history

Only one version on file - nothing to compare yet. As later stages (committee substitute, engrossed, enrolled) are captured, the redline appears here.

View official text →

Lobbying Activity

No state lobbying filings in our records match this bill. Federal lobbying reports (LDA) cover Congress, so they are not listed on state bills.

Full breakdown

Who this bill affects and the strongest case for and against it, written only from the bill’s own text.

Sponsors

Discoveries

1 pattern noticed across the record

Patterns POLISCOPE noticed across the record. These are observations to investigate, not conclusions.

policy shift98% confidence

Integration of AI Use into Criminal Sentencing

The bill amends criminal law to directly increase prison sentences by one year when generative artificial intelligence is used to assist in committing a noncapital felony.

Connected Entities

Linda Serrato, State of New Mexico
PersonLinda Serrato“Introduced House Bill 141 in the New Mexico Legislature.”Map →
locationState of New Mexico“Jurisdiction where the Artificial Intelligence Accountability Act applies.”Map →

Sources

Open source document

www.nmlegis.gov

Analysis Score

0–100
  • Significance20
    Lowered because this bill did not pass (its text scored 85)
  • Controversy65
    Intensity of disagreement among stakeholders
  • Entertainment10
    Compellingness for a non-policy-wonk reader
  • Buzz75
    Current news / social attention level

Publisher tools

Share or embed this record

POLISCOPE publisher tools

Share or embed this record